| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 4,544 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
That is a very beautiful coin, I know very little about this type but I would grade it at AU-58. The letters on the neck are JBL the designer of the coin.
Edited by echizento
10/29/2010 1:48 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3592 Posts |
AdamE, I believe those are the designers initials JWL...but I'm not positive
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
763 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Beautiful coin! Looks like it could be an MS64 or possibly even a 65. $20 Liberty's get very pricey (even common dates) at the MS65 level and this coin appears close at a 65.
I would have your coin graded by a major service like PCGS or NGC in the near future!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
321 Posts |
AU 58. It's extremely clean for a jewelry piece, no dirt or toning or anything. It looks perfectly preserved. If it was completely untouched, I would venture to weak 65. Really clean fields and the cheek marks look minor enough in these shots.
Does the edge or rim have any markings from the clasps?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2448 Posts |
Wow! And I'm not really a fan of gold coins or Longacer designs.
|
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
I agree with AU58. Nice gold!
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
A very beautiful coin.
I would have to go AU 55/58
I am seeing slight or a trace of wear wear on lower cheek/mid neck/lower neck, of Liberty.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
763 Posts |
Quote:
Does the edge or rim have any markings from the clasps? Other than some small marks on the rims (which are visible in the pictures), I don't see any evidence of the marks left by the clasps. I'm not even sure if those marks were caused by the clasps. The reeded edge is in great shape. Quote:
I would have your coin graded by a major service like PCGS or NGC in the near future! I am planning on sending it to PCGS with my next submissions. I'll post the results. It'll will become part of my certified type set. |
|
Valued Member
United States
321 Posts |
Quote:
I don't see any evidence of the marks left by the clasps. thats a relief. I'm excited to see what PCGS says, keep us posted |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I hope you get a 64. Here's a PCGS MS64 of mine. Yours compares very favorably.  |
|
Valued Member
United States
273 Posts |
My first guess was 65. Make sure to update us when PCGS gets a grade on it!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
438 Posts |
Sure doesn't look like a jewelery piece. Probably AU-58, but PCGS may MS-64 it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
After seeing bherring1964's slabbed MS-64 ...
I am leaning to agree with him. What I was seeing on this coin
is the same I see on his. Just a slight rub in cheek and neck area.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
Very nice coin! I think what is throwing me off a bit(and maybe others too), is it's hard to tell from those pictures how much luster is retained on Liberty's face/hair. The fields are fully lustrous, so it is a 58 minimum imo...but I cant tell how much luster is on the face. If there is luster I'm not seeing, it could easily be 64-65; so maybe some more pics would help.
From bherring's picture, it is easier to tell that the devices are lustrous.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 4,544 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 10/29/2010 11:28 am
