| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,797 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
689 Posts |
I think it could be an AU55 with some possible strike weakness. Very nice coin!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
266 Posts |
AU-55 was my first thought. Cleaned or just bad lighting?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
103 Posts |
Scanner... luster is great but scanner wont pick it up
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
That's the worst part of a scanner, it doesn't show the luster on the coin. I don't like grading with scanner pics, but I'll say MS-60 nice Indian.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1081 Posts |
I would say AU-55. Nice overall, looks to be some wear on both ribbons and some scattered marks and discoloration on back.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
225 Posts |
The image makes me guess lower than it might be.
AU53
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
When I first saw it, AU55 popped into my head ;-)
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
763 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
Why does the obverse appear doubled?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3546 Posts |
biggfredd,
The doubling is one of the undesirable characteristics that my scanner also produces but mostly when scanning silver coins only. I am unsure about the best method for eliminating this doubling effect on copper coins for other non-Epson scanners.
I have, however, been reasonably successful 75% of the time eliminating the doubling when scanning silver coins on my own Epson product. Since the upper interior lid of my scanner lid/cover is pure white I have simply placed a dark grey vinyl substrate on top of my coin before closing the scanner's lid on top of it.
This procedure may also possibly work for other non-silver coins on other printer brands but my Epson WorkForce 610 printer/scanner will usually scan copper coins without having to deploy this method.
mdpmedia
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1817 Posts |
Great looking coin, the lowest curl seems to have a trace of wear, or it could be a reflection from your scanner. The strike is also incomplete, but these copper-nickel cents were difficult to strike up fully, which is why they lasted 7 years only. Conservatively, AU-58 could be MS61/62 on a good day! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
To much wear OBVERSE: feather tips, hair above ear, hair behind ear, and on the band with diamonds (the area over the hair). REVERSE: Is that a fingerprint on the shield?
tops of leaves in wreath, ribbon over arrows.
My guess and thats what it is a guess Au-53 55
|
|
Valued Member
United States
374 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
132 Posts |
AU 53 - nice tone, but almost too clean?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
784 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,797 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/22/2011 09:46 am
