| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 5,144 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
737 Posts |
Could be wear? A mix of that and lighting? Either way, looking good Dave. White balance looks fairly good. If you can set up or angle another light to get rid of the shadows that would be good too! What settings did you settle on for your camera?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
260 Posts |
Great pics! Which camera did you get? Also is that date 8/7? 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
260 Posts |
Oh. Okay, I see that it's the fujifine film. Do you mind if I ask how much you paid for it?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
Nice photo... Play with that lighting setup to get the best representation of the coin... Great coin too!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
91 Posts |
It looks like you are getting some reflection off of something red and it is showing up next to the stars - upper right
Alan
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
weird eye, looks retooled.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
260 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Man, that 7 jumps out at you on that last 8.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
737 Posts |
Right!? That's an awesome example Dave!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
if that's supposed to be a Capped Bust half dollar, certain differences in the design have me questioning if its authentic 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote:if that's supposed to be a Capped Bust half dollar, certain differences in the design have me questioning if its authentic Can you elaborate? Looks like a rather nice O-101 to me. Nice shot, busthalf. Far better to have the help sitting next to you than on your computer screen. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
Quote: Can you elaborate? Looks like a rather nice O-101 to me. I can't really find a great picture of a 1818 online, and can't be sure without seeing ones side-by-side. - the bottom right star is usually lower compared to the hair - the top left star is usually a little higher - the pointed folds at back of neck: the lower point should be shorter these may all be variances in the dies, so don't take my opinion as gospel
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1304 Posts |
This may or may not hep Fuzzy317
O-101 Obverse die 1. Reverse die A.
Obverse: Date 11mm. 181 wider than last 18. First 8 is larger than secnd 8. Serifs and crossbar from 7 easily shows above top of 8 and there is a trace of the stand in the lower loop. Center dot located on neck
Reverse: Center dot between crossbars 4 and 5. T-I are in line on the right side,
Let me know if it does.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
Quote: busthalf This may or may not hep Fuzzy317  I am not good with varieties, so I withdraw my questioning it being authentic
Edited by Fuzzy317 04/20/2011 10:48 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
It's no big thing, Fuzzy; keep in mind, Bust Halves have been studied into complete boredom by some very capable people.  The specific locations of stars on individual Bust Half dies change by die. It's one of the two or three most important features to study when attributing them - the location of the first, seventh, eighth and thirteenth stars relative to the denticles is recorded for every single known Bust Half variety. A second major pickup (at least in the way I attribute Busties) is the location of the "I" in "PLURIBUS" relative to the "T" in "STATES." In a majority of cases, these two are enough to nail down an attribution. With busthalf's specific coin here, we know that there are three varieties of "8 over 7." O-101, 102 and 103. The locations of the stars, and the obvious overdate, narrow it down to two choices. And here is where I have to admit my error: O-101 and O-103 use the same obverse, and only the obverse of this coin is shown. If you look closely, you will see a die crack on the coin in the areas I've circled in the picture here: Late die states of O-101, and all of O-103, have this crack. They use distinctive and easily-differentiated reverses; the T-I relationship I mentioned above would nail that difference immediately, as would the appearance of "50 C" on the reverse. Yet, the reverse is not shown. So, I cannot call this O-101, and in that way I'm wrong for having called it conclusively O-101 earlier. So, which is it, busthalf? 
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 5,144 |
Page 2 of 2
|