| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 8,026 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
Quote:
I thought this was neat!  |
|
Valued Member
United States
434 Posts |
I like it. I've found 4-5 of these (different dates) but someone on the board said it was common so I didn't save them.... should I? Any premium?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
I wouldn't say they are all that common
I couldn't say they command a premium.
I would and could say that if you like them, you should save them.
If you save coins only because they are more valuable than the average coin, its probably not worth keeping.
Personally, I have no reservations about slapping a coin into a 2x2, or throwing it into a tube with similar coins, just because its different, or because I like the way it looks.
Edit in italics.
Edited by scurry64
05/13/2011 1:58 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
Who knows, this could have been the transitional die variety 1988 RDV 006, in which case the die polishing shown here destroyed the coins collectable value. In fact, I think it is the 1988 RDV 006 since it is a WAM. Bummer.Edit in bold. Edited by scurry64
05/13/2011 2:09 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
It's a RDV005. The RDV006 has all the devices wider than the normal 1988 cents. So it is not just the FG that is different the whole reverse devices are wider.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
I was wrong. I'm sorry. I was at work and didn't have any 1988 LMC to look at. I was reading what Ken Wexler wrote about the 1988 RDV 006, which was: Quote:
There was, however, a very significant difference between the design used from 1989 through 1992 and the new design introduced in 1993. On the new 1993 reverse design the bottoms of the A and M in AMERICA are almost touching. ALL previous reverse designs had a significant space between the bottoms of the A and M. (emphasis added) I apparently misunderstood what Mr. Wexler meant. I should have waited until I had an opportunity to check my 1988 RDV 006 before saying anything. Sorry board. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3640 Posts |
Scurry
I am the head of the "Sorry Board" around here.
So, No Sorry's allowed. Sorry.
You will be tried, found guilty of course, then be punished
under the Sorry Coin Act of 1776 in accordance with chapter
16 article 27. The guilty as found will be sentenced to 20 yrs. of easy labor licking copper coins until your tongue
falls off. Reasoning behind this punishment is that you will
never ever again be able to say "SORRY" Sawwee maybe, but no more SORRY. Next case.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3640 Posts |
Also, you owe Hoosier One Cent.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
Pretty stiff punishment.
I'll take a look around and see if I can find a cent.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3592 Posts |
scurry64, you can just pay Rob with my paypal account since you have used it before  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3640 Posts |
It could be worse. Say "Penny" when referring to a U.S. one cent.  That one is out of my jurisdiction though. Copper coin boss makes those decisions. |
|
Valued Member
United States
260 Posts |
I found one of these last night and kept it because I think it's cool and because it's nice grade. |
|
Valued Member
United States
333 Posts |
So why can't I say "penny?"
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3640 Posts |
You may say Penny if you wish. The Penny term will never
go away anytime soon. No Pennys/pennies were ever minted in the U.S. They minted Cents. Great britain/UK minted Pennys.
I even tried to stop saying Penny but with no luck.
Just asking for a roll of Cents in the bank confuses most tellers etc.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
Quote:
asking for a roll of Cents in the bank confuses most tellers etc. |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 8,026 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/13/2011 1:18 pm
