| Author |
Replies: 27 / Views: 12,680 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
uncle al,,, Quote: I can't figure out what BTW stands for... BTW...by the way.. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1472 Posts |
Sure wish I had a XRF, but the next best thing is having an offer from SPP to zap your coin. Don't miss out on that one, he has done some of my steel nickels which we suspected of different plating results. Suspicions were correct and I have a MS coin with no plating to brag about. Raw steel strikes up very shiney, but is very vulnerable to oxidation.
|
|
New Member
Canada
24 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1733 Posts |
Yeah Zonad all type of plating errors are definitely occurring here, I've been looking around for missing nickel plate with a intact copper plate but haven't found any yet myself. This sort of makes sense because it would stand out like a banana at an apple convention.
I've seen a few loonies that were plated but had their plating disappear because of improper cleaning or dipping between steps. I've also seen one quarter that missed the copper strike bath and the nickel plate subsequently peeled off. I mean there's at least 8 steps in plating these, I suppose mistakes are bound to happen, be nice to be able to catalogue each common error for a collection.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9865 Posts |
I have a strange coppery coloured quarter that may be a result of missing the final nickel plating
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1733 Posts |
Post up a thread DBM, let's diagnose it and take a look ! Take a weight as well please if you have a scale.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9865 Posts |
I have a new to me/used camera arriving soon.I'm going to try and emulate ikandiggits low cost coin photo setup,hopefully I can put up a pic soon.
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10458 Posts |
Quote: Sure wish I had a XRF,... True, an XRF is more useful to an error collector than a microscope, however the model I use (which is self-contained and safer to use) will set you back about $65K. I am always more than happy to zap coins for fellow numismatists, in the name of learning and publishing. I also have a colleague who has a SEM in his basement. An SEM can focus on a specific part of a coin, for quantitative analysis, but only of the coin's surface. I can do that as well, but it costs me $10 per coin to zap.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
New Member
Canada
33 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21620 Posts |
Should be non-magnetic. The 1994 is Nickel Plated Copper.
|
|
New Member
Canada
33 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21620 Posts |
True, but by looking at your pictures, it appears that the Nickel plating is missing, so it would be non-magnetic.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
54282 Posts |
This fooled me into reading a thread from 2011 (that apparently had no resolution).
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
17960 Posts |
If 1992 Canadian nickels are 25% nickel and 75% copper, then the alloy is fairly similar to British post-1947 'silver' coins, and this is exactly how I would expect one of those to look when I dig it up when metal detecting.
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10458 Posts |
Quote: The 1994 is Nickel Plated Copper. No - 5c coins from 1982 to 2000 are copper-nickel alloys (same as US 5c coins). They should be non-magnetic.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 27 / Views: 12,680 |
Page 2 of 2
|