| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 2,629 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1348 Posts |
I think you are right! Thanks.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Well you know it isn't an 1800. And the 9 does seam to show a bit of a curve so I too ssy 1890.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1064 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
455 Posts |
It would have to be 1890 because the Carson City mint stopped minting coins in 1894. That rules out 1900. and the second digit looks like the top of an 8 . It can't be 1892 or 1893 either because the second 0 can be seen almost half way down and one would be able to discern a 2 or 3 instead of an 0.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I agree that it has to be 1890. The only other date that I could think of that would look like that one is 1880 but that can be ruled out because the third digit would look like the second digit which it doesn't on this coin.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3294 Posts |
As far as a grade goes, do you think this would be an FR02, or only a P01?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1348 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1348 Posts |
I think I have Superdave Avatar for a coin :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1415 Posts |
I'm having second thoughts -  1800 I think I saw one on e-bay from a Chinese seller. Just keeping an open mind |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1510 Posts |
how much is that worth?
Retired USAF 1983-2003
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2734 Posts |
Edited by DNA
08/24/2011 8:50 pm
|
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
The last two digits certainly do not look like the second, so I agree with 1890.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
I'm liking VAM 7,,,  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,629 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 08/24/2011 09:20 am
