| Author |
 Replies: 24 / Views: 3,322 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
I saw this SLQ last night while searching for a Type II SLQ for my slabbed 7070 collection. At first, it looked nice (not so crazy about the toning), but it's OBVIOUSLY a Type I, not a Type 2 as identified on the slab insert. Yes, even the "experts" make mistakes.  |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
291 Posts |
Send that one back in for the type 1 designation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
652 Posts |
Yep - even PCGS makes mistakes. That's just one of many I've seen. Did that one sell for Type 1 or Type 2 pricing?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
652 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7840 Posts |
Winning bid (was not me): US$460.99 (US$507.09 with Buyer's Fee) http://www.greatcollections.com/Coi...CGS-MS-63-FHAccording to the PCGS Certification Database, the requested certification number is defined as the following:
COIN INFORMATION
Cert Verification #: 16592738
PCGS Coin #: 5719
Date, mintmark: 1917-S
Denomination: 25C
Variety: Type 2
Minor Variety:
Mint Error:
Pedigree:
Country: The United States of America
Grade: MS63FH
Mintage: 5,552,000
PCGS Price GuideSM Value: $900
Holder Type: Standard
Population: 70 http://www.pcgs.com/Cert/16592738/Edited by oih82w8
08/14/2012 11:58 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4426 Posts |
Yep, definitely ... the "Janet Jackson" variety!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
57 Posts |
Isn't that something !@!
Kinda hard to miss the wardrobe malfunction.
Thanks for posting! Herbie.
Edited by steelheadwill
08/14/2012 12:55 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I see allot of mistakes on 1878 Morgans like this also. It seems NGC is more prominent than PCGS at doing it but I have seen 8TF varieties marked as being 1878 7TF from both services
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
620 Posts |
Guess thos folks that work at PCGS are just normal, everyone makes a mistake once in a while.
I would have thought there quality control would catch this before the coin was sent out.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4426 Posts |
Over the years, I've seen many obvious errors such as this displayed in dealer's cases at shows. One of my favorites was a 1909-S Indian cent in a 1909-S Lincoln Cent holder, ala PCGS. It's slabbing errors such as these that cause me to wonder ... Do PCGS or NGC ever make a numerical mistake, say between MS-64 and MS-65, MS-66 and MS-67? This is purely a rhetorical question on my part! |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Definitely a mechanical error it is obviously a type 1, the head isn't the only thing that is full.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
526 Posts |
ROF  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1208 Posts |
I have seen counterfiet coins slabbed.
It happens.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
...in counterfeit slabs.  Edited by oih82w8
08/15/2012 1:57 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts |
Quote:
...in counterfeit slabs.  $50 on AliBaba. $45/each if ordered in quantities of 50 or more. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts |
But on a more serious note more in tune with the OP, the only slabbed coin collection I'd consider is collecting PCGS, NGS and ANACS slabs with mistakes on their labels.
Puts a whole new spin on the phrase "error collector" :-)
Edited by SteveCaruso
08/15/2012 5:04 pm
|
| |
Replies: 24 / Views: 3,322 |
Posted 08/14/2012 11:30 am
