I have this one as O-102. Don't know for sure if it's 102a, probably so because of the advanced stage of the reverse. If O-104 shares the reverse, this is the second usage.
1) The oval in the obverse clasp is artificially recut. No way it looks that deep given the rest of the strike. Not a chance, especially knowing that's the first thing that Bust Half doctors do.
2) The toning isn't original. If you define an "old" cleaning as one which took place no less than 25 years ago, this is an "old" cleaning.
3) Detail grade is strong VF. I like this coin; I'd own this coin; if the buyer got over on you, he's not sending his kids to college as a result. Heck, he's not buying a six-pack as a result.
You didn't beat him, but he didn't beat you either.
1) The oval in the obverse clasp is artificially recut. No way it looks that deep given the rest of the strike. Not a chance, especially knowing that's the first thing that Bust Half doctors do.
2) The toning isn't original. If you define an "old" cleaning as one which took place no less than 25 years ago, this is an "old" cleaning.
3) Detail grade is strong VF. I like this coin; I'd own this coin; if the buyer got over on you, he's not sending his kids to college as a result. Heck, he's not buying a six-pack as a result.
You didn't beat him, but he didn't beat you either.























