| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 639 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
137 Posts |
Looks like someone missed a step here. Is this just an error coin? weighs 1.9 grams. This also has a wide "AM"   |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
393 Posts |
Hi, sirguardian. The design for Lincoln penny 2001 is a wide "AM". It looks like your coin had been dip in a corrosive material which caused a decrease in weight (1.9 grams) from the weight of 2.5 grams.  Enjoy the hobby...  |
|
Valued Member
United States
137 Posts |
All of my 2001 cents have a "close" AM. I'm not sold on the corrosive theory. The edges are to consistent. The marred portions look like the results from heat during press. This coin is thin as a dime but it's not a Mule type. I need to investigate further. I'm just curious, I have never seen this.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
393 Posts |
Enjoy investigating on your coin, sirguardian. Gained knowledge is very indispensable in every day activities... have fun... |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
37210 Posts |
Looks like acid/environmental damage to me. John1  ( I'm no pro, it's just my humble opinion )
Searched 5+ Million Cents Since 1971
|
|
Valued Member
United States
137 Posts |
Got it... closer look on the AM is questionable for the condition... still a keeper here. Thanks guys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4612 Posts |
The FG initials show it to be a normal closed AM reverse for that year.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4600 Posts |
 with John1, environmental or acid damage. No mystery found here. PMD, not a keeper.
ça va bien aller
|
|
Valued Member
United States
137 Posts |
No monetary value... but a teachable product for the young ones behind me. Thanks
|
|
Valued Member
United States
137 Posts |
Jim0815 Can you expand on your last. My view I see separation on AM. You say this is normal for 2001?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
47862 Posts |
Note the roughness of the zinc addition over the plating on this coin. Altered surface. Not a mint error.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
8473 Posts |
I agree that it is a close AM. There are other markers to go by besides the AM. Sometimes die polishing can cause a slight gap but it is still a CAM. As far as the missing copper, I agree with John1, the coin is too light to be missing the copper clad at the planchet stage. |
|
Valued Member
United States
137 Posts |
Roger that. It makes sense. I will put it in my "Odd Ball" collection with a short caption. Thanks
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 639 |
|
Posted 01/14/2020 5:02 pm
