| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 2,061 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
Edited by TobyJ
07/18/2020 12:36 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
MS 62, but this one is real tough. Difficult to tell if the high points have wear or are just tarnished
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
857 Posts |
Really murky/frosty MS-64
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Tough to get a good feel on this one. MS-63?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6590 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
That is tough, I'll take a stab at MS-63, maybe 64. Tough to see what's going on on the lower cheek/chin area  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36826 Posts |
A soft strike. Very clean cheek, all original surfaces. I think this one could go MS-65 even with the soft details.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
646 Posts |
I can't see it much better than EF-45 to AU-50.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5675 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
857 Posts |
Idk how this coin could grade less then mintstate with full luster.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Definitely dipped but I suspect they let this one slide by into an AU-58 holder.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
From these photos, no higher than AU50. Not a coin I would want to own. Possibly dipped and possibly cleaned.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5675 Posts |
Not often we see guesses ranging from XF-40 cleaned to MS-65 original, and virtually everything in between. Very curious to see what NGC said.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
looks cleaned but ill say AU-58 could just be the photos though
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,061 |
Posted 07/18/2020 2:46 pm
