Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 644 |
|
New Member
35 Posts |
I have a dateless 179? Liberty Cap Lettered Edge Large Cent. This coin is very worn down and shows no date. I have the Diameter Thickness and Weight of this coin. I feel the coins measurements align more with the 1793 Beaded Border Large Cent. The problem is looking at the border it does not look to be beaded at all. Lastly my co-collector thinks it could possibly be the 1794 Head of the 1793 due to the hair that is still visible. Stating that the hair flows more horizontally than diagonally. Hoping someone with Sheldon Verity knowledge can help identify the date. Pictures shown below. Diameter 28.84 millimeters Thickness 2.26 millimeters Weight 12.44 grams      
|
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
54835 Posts |
Can you sharpen that obverse close-up, please?  to the CCF!
|
New Member
35 Posts |
|
Valued Member
Canada
135 Posts |
First of all, it cannot be a "1797 LCLC", as they were never struck...
|
Valued Member
Canada
135 Posts |
Edited by whatdowehavehere 12/20/2020 5:34 pm
|
New Member
35 Posts |
I know its not a 1797. I am looking for a Sheldon Variety to confirm a specific date. Either 1793 due to the specs given or its a 1794 or 1795 because of the weight and lettered edge. Cannot be a 1796 due to the weight of the 1796 is much less. If anyone has Sheldon Variety Knowledge to confirm a date that would be much apricated. I believe a Sheldon Variety is the only way other than the specs given to determine the date.
|
Valued Member
Canada
135 Posts |
Check 1794 S-17 (is LI B separated like this?), and look at the leaf tip on the edge after DOLLAR: does it point up or down? 
Edited by whatdowehavehere 12/20/2020 11:41 pm
|
New Member
35 Posts |
LI almost touching B is further away from I So LI BERTY basically I do not get this leaf thing I can barely find any information on it and no picture references. Below are two more pictures one of the DOLLAR leaf and one of LI B zoomed in with red lines showing the spacing. Thank You  
|
Valued Member
Canada
135 Posts |
Edited by whatdowehavehere 12/20/2020 10:35 pm
|
Valued Member
Canada
135 Posts |
It gets the "Two Thumbs Up" from my buddy, so Good Luck! Even if it were "just" a Hd. of '93, it's still worth hundreds. The 1794 S-17 is an easy Hd. of '93 to identify: the date is very widely spaced, and the LI B... is spaced this way only on the S-17.
Edited by whatdowehavehere 12/20/2020 10:54 pm
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
552 Posts |
Very intriguing...where'd you get her? smat
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17230 Posts |
I don't see it as a 17, To me it looks like an 18b or 19b, rev doesn't match 19b so I think it is probably an 18b. (17and 18 use the same rev)
On 17 B is lower than the I and rotated clockwise, on 18 it is higher and not rotated. On the OP coin it is high and not rotated. The spacing between IB is not much different on either variety. On 17 the T is lower closer to the hair, on the OP coin it is distant which matches 18.
Gary Schmidt
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20089 Posts |
 Send it our for cirtification.
just carl
|
New Member
35 Posts |
Thank you Conder101 for the feedback. Just curious why the diameter would be closer to 1793 mintage?
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17230 Posts |
These early cents were struck without a close collar so their diameter with vary depending on the force of the strike. While the supposed standard for all the large cents were 28.5 mm, the early dates can vary anywhere from around 28 to as much as 30.5 mm. I find most of them are in the 28.5 to 29.2 mm.
Gary Schmidt
Edited by Conder101 12/23/2020 8:23 pm
|
|
Replies: 14 / Views: 644 |
|