Opinion On Authenticity - Morgans

On photo of coin #1, my first thought was Chinese counterfeit because of look and toning. The coin has more correct than wrong. The date is a far date and the CC is a titled left that were both used on the 92CC. The wear is consistent on both side to about vf25. I believe the is genuine. The other 3 appear to be genuine, but I did not look at them in any detail.

Thank you for the feedback Slider. I agree the toning on the first one raised a flag. Also the shape of the curl on the 2 just looks off. All photos I can find show more of a ball on the end of the curl.....but again resolution on these photos are not the best. I am certain if any of these are not authentic that it is a one-off. Again, this is a very experienced auctioneer selling a single owner collection of over 300 lots. If one (or more) are not genuine then it had likely fooled the owner of the collection for some time as well. Certainly none of these coins would I purchase from these pics alone (e.g. Ebay) being raw but as mentioned it is an in-person auction so I will get to closely inspect. With the Covid deal there have been a good number of nice estate auctions over the course of the past year that has allowed me to complete a majority of the Morgan series. Prices at in-person sales have been buyer friendly on key dates even when internet bidding is offered as the poor quality of photos (and normal internet buyer premiums) tend to suppress the online bid. As mentioned I am most interested in the 93-CC which appears to be in the low-end range of Fine. Two lines in the cotton bolls just discernable. The first of the 92-CCs looks nice if I can get comfortable with it and I would pull the trigger if it went for the right price. The cleaning on the 89-CC is a turn-off.

Well, I'd give them a magnet test and weigh them, but the appear to be OK to me.
(when weighing, don't forget to add the weight of the U-DO-IT and staples...)