Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 313 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4777 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9086 Posts |
64, lots of light bag rub but no major marks
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
917 Posts |
Looks like MS63+, I think just a bit too in bag coin fighting to make 64.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1448 Posts |
MS 62 Star I think the obverse is quite prooflike but reverse I am not sure about, though 62 PL would not surprise me.
|
Valued Member
United States
173 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3632 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
69088 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12241 Posts |
MS63. assessing PL from photos is very difficult. another one that has PL qualities but depth needs to be determined as well as if its enough on both sides to pull the designation. I dont think its DMPL
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1192 Posts |
The obverse photos just don't look PL to me. MS63.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4777 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
4126 Posts |
MS63 PL, lots of small chatter and breaks in the obverse frost, but nothing major. Good looking reverse
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4777 Posts |
This got MS-62PL. Clearly I need more experience in determining PL/DMPL Qualities
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4648 Posts |
My first impressions were 62 PL. Very, very similar to the other coin you posted.
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
917 Posts |
I'm surprised they gave it PL, because the reverse eagle doesn't look too frosty, but then again maybe the fields are very reflective. Against newspaper print is it very clear and reflective on both sides in the fields?
|
|
Replies: 13 / Views: 313 |
|