Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 754 |
|
Valued Member
United States
419 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2413 Posts |
I don't see too many marks so from that I would say ms64 but its flatter then my 1937 so ill go with 62. Hard to tell the luster from pictures. I've got coins in au58 that look better then ms64. Difficult series to grade. Usually the ms65 and ms66 are shining with luster.
Edited by jessvc1 10/09/2022 5:08 pm
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
75006 Posts |
Is that arc along the bison's lower jaw and beard a scratch?
|
Valued Member
United States
419 Posts |
@coinfrog, it's on the holder
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
75006 Posts |
Thanks - I'll say MS65. Really attractive.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1270 Posts |
I think they gave this one a 64. Luster isn't jumping out at me. Pretty coin and nice strike, though.
My hoard of '82s is up to 241! 218 BC x 1, 118 BC x 3, 18 BC x 1, 82 x 1, 182 x 1, 282 x 2, 382 x 1, 582 x 2, 682 x 1, 782 x 2, 882 x 1, 982 x 4, 1082 x 1 1182 x 8, 1282 x 2, 1382 x 1, 1482 x 6, 1582 x 13, 1682 x 17, 1782 x 60, 1882 x 68, 1982 x 45
Edited by Collects82 10/09/2022 9:10 pm
|
Valued Member
United States
410 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
4378 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
26118 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10594 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
13697 Posts |
|
Valued Member
Canada
476 Posts |
|
Valued Member
United States
419 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
13697 Posts |
no problem. most of us had it at 65 but I can see it at 66. nice coin. congrats
|
Valued Member
United States
410 Posts |
That's fair. Looking back at it, I don't see anything stopping it from being a 67. Nice coin.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2413 Posts |
Buffalo's are hard as it is especially from pictures
|
|
Replies: 15 / Views: 754 |
|