Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop CCF Members on eBay! 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Trial? Test? Experimental? Pattern Coin?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,458Next Topic
Page: of 2
New Member
DynexBATS's Avatar
Philippines
5 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  09:16 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add DynexBATS to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hello!! Greetings to all of you. I've been keeping this coins for myself for god knows how long but today I'm gonna share it all to you just to give an awareness that this coins actually exist.
I don't really know if its a trial / test / experimental or pattern coin, I really don't want to speculate.
This are the details of each coin base on my many many years of research, please know that this is my hypothesis that I intended to share as a head start to those who want to know further about my coins.

Here are the details:

1. 1965 Proof Quarter no mint mark
2. 1969 Proof Quarter no mint mark
3. 1974 Proof Quarter no mint mark
4. 1979 Proof Quarter with D mint mark
5. 1985 Proof Quarter with P mint mark
6. 1986 Proof Quarter with P mint mark
7. 1988 Proof Quarter with D mint mark
8. 1990 Proof Quarter with D mint mark
9. 1991 Proof Quarter with D mint mark
10. 1991 Proof Quarter with P mint mark
11. 1993 Proof Quarter with P mint mark
12. 1983 Proof Dime with D mint mark
13. 1946 Proof Penny no mint mark - even the 1946 "S" is a regular strike on this year.
14. 1960 Proof Penny with D mint mark - this is not a D over D but there is another D is on the rim.
15. 1967 Proof Penny no mint mark - it has a diamond tipped pit in both 12 o clock position on obverse and reverse.
16. 1971 Proof Penny no mint mark - 1971 "S" proof is rare and very expensive, what are the odds? you can do the math.
17. 1975 Proof Penny no mint mark - it was struck/stamp by something by something that I don't know, its far from the date though.
18. 1979 Proof Penny no mint mark
19. 1953 with D and 1973 with D penny - this two are actually also proofs but I experimented on them a long time ago, I left them in the open and change its location every 2 weeks to a month. different humidity, temperature etc. but not in the elements like sunlight or rain. and as you can see they tarnish differently. one has a light brown and the other has a beautiful orange red tarnish. it seems that all of this pennies have different metal composition.
20. 1989 Proof Jefferson nickel with D mint mark
21. "1963 Proof Jefferson 90% silver with no mint mark" - First thing you will notice about this is its more white, it really stands out to the other nickels. Its a little bit small in diameter, and thinner. Its about 20% smaller in total compared to a regular nickel, but its weight is 4.8 grams, it doesn't make sense for it size. So its suppose to weight only 4 grams for its size, its 0.8 grams denser then. Next I did was an ice cube test along with a normal 90% silver coin, a 40% silver coin and a normal nickel. I did it many time and I get same result, its as fast or sometime 2-3 seconds slower than 90% but that was understandable because I use a 90% quarter as a comparison, its has a larger surface than a nickel. I haven't tried any other test aside from that not only because its valuable but its my most favorite coin among all them.

If you guys have more questions or some test you want me to perform on this coin, if its possible for me and it won't give any damage to the coins please fell free to ask. Anyway thank you for letting me join this forum. Have a nice day.

https://pixeldrain.com/u/XEF3qYYK
https://pixeldrain.com/u/z59hcsSt
https://pixeldrain.com/u/b2PPfi2G
https://pixeldrain.com/u/vYxm7PFh
Forum Dad
Learn More...
bobby131313's Avatar
United States
24147 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  09:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bobby131313 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't see a single proof in those images. Not one.

New Member
DynexBATS's Avatar
Philippines
5 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  10:09 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DynexBATS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
oh the shots are outdoor, in a daylight. this is what it looks like indoor.
Trial?-Test?-Experimental?-Pattern-Coin?
Forum Dad
Learn More...
bobby131313's Avatar
United States
24147 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  10:15 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bobby131313 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Still not seeing it. Looks like a BU circulation coin.
New Member
DynexBATS's Avatar
Philippines
5 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  10:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DynexBATS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
How about the weight sir? Does BU circulation coin weigh like this?
https://pixeldrain.com/u/K2Ece86c
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187446 Posts
New Member
DynexBATS's Avatar
Philippines
5 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  11:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DynexBATS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you sir. Glad to be here.
Forum Dad
Learn More...
bobby131313's Avatar
United States
24147 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  11:37 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bobby131313 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Same year and date circulation coins and proof coins weight the same.

But you weren't talking about weight, you said all the coins in your original post are proofs. I'm saying none of them are.

Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
HondoB's Avatar
United States
24878 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  12:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add HondoB to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
These are not proof coins.
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
New Member
DynexBATS's Avatar
Philippines
5 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  12:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DynexBATS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
yes sir. I said its proof, but you said its Bu circulation so I'm asking back if Bu circulation weigh 2.8grams? I must confess that I'm bad at taking a photos, so I took your opinion that its a Bu circulation. Now, I'm asking does Bu circulation weigh 2.8grams? What is this really mean is, you made an assessment base on what you see on the photos base on your opinion, is it really all that easy, there are alot of things needed to make an assessment. yet you said it twice that's its a BU circulation like you are 100% sure so I'm asking, does BU circulation really weigh 2.8grams?

just to add up: I really hate schooling people but the correct way of assessing this is to ask for a magnification photo of the coin, if you see a multiple strike marks or not, that's how you can tell if its proof or Bu circulation. I hope you are aware of PR60 and impaired proof. In the end its still called a proof.
Edited by DynexBATS
02/20/2023 12:55 pm
Forum Dad
Learn More...
bobby131313's Avatar
United States
24147 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  1:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bobby131313 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I really hate schooling people but the correct way of assessing this is to ask for a magnification photo of the coin, if you see a multiple strike marks or not, that's how you can tell if its proof or Bu circulation.


Wow, you're schooling me? I'm aware most proof coins are struck twice, but I've never see "multiple strike marks" on a proof coin.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
HondoB's Avatar
United States
24878 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  2:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add HondoB to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
DynexBATS, how did you determine that this 1975 LMC is a proof coin?
Trial?-Test?-Experimental?-Pattern-Coin?
Trial?-Test?-Experimental?-Pattern-Coin?
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  2:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
DynexBATS,

What are you using to take photos with? A copper cent should weigh 3.1 grams +/- .12 grams mint tolerance. Proof and business strike coins will weigh the same.
John1
Pillar of the Community
United States
1655 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  5:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add lcutler to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
None of those coins look even remotely like proof coins. If one is underweight, that is another indication of a normal business strike, it is quite common for business strike coins to be off weight a bit, but the mint is more careful with proof coins.
Edited by lcutler
02/20/2023 5:24 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94636 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2023  5:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I wish I could see even one proof in your lot, but, alas, there is none. How did you come to the conclusion that these business and somewhat damages coins are proofs - also how do you correlate BU coins to being only 2.8 grams? especially when you have a mixed lot of quarters, dimes, nickels, and cent coins (non of which should weigh 2.8 grams).
Valued Member
DiscoLover82's Avatar
United States
218 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2023  08:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DiscoLover82 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
To make this clear to OP (as it doesn't seem anybody has specified this yet): the Denver mint has never made proof versions of circulating coins. Proofs were made in Philadelphia with no mintmark in 1964 and before, and in San Francisco with an "S" mintmark since 1968.


Quote:
just to add up: I really hate schooling people but the correct way of assessing this is to ask for a magnification photo of the coin, if you see a multiple strike marks or not, that's how you can tell if its proof or Bu circulation. I hope you are aware of PR60 and impaired proof. In the end its still called a proof.

Whoever told you this is severely misinformed. "Impaired proofs" are a thing - but they have to actually be proofs first. There's no indication that any of these coins are anything other than regular circulation strikes, judging by the pictures and by the dates and mintmarks themselves.

Also, that 1963 nickel is not 90% silver. It's made of an alloy of 25% nickel and 75% copper, the same as any other nickel since 1866 (with the exception of the 35% silver War Nickels made from 1942-1945).
Edited by DiscoLover82
02/21/2023 08:25 am
  Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,458Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.45 seconds to rattle this change. Forums