Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop CCF Members on eBay! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

A Question Of Definitions

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,936Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 06/08/2010  7:07 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Is anyone but me bothered by the way "Contemporary" is used in Numismatics? Specifically the way it is thrown around and loosely applied to situations where it is terribly misleading.

In general, the word has TWO essentially Contradictory definitions.

1. Characteristic of the present; belonging to the present time.

2. Something existing at the same time; from the same time period, coexistent.

The first definition can be used to mean something - like a counterfeit coin made Yesterday or Today but at the same time Numismatists tend to apply it in the second way to refer to a coin made "at the same time" as the coin being copied was in circulation.

When I have challenged ebay sellers about their use of "Contemporary", they invariably refer to the common or first meaning. They say they are correct in describing a Chines forgery as Contemporary when it is clearly modern.

I understand that technically the correct numismatic terminology is "Contemporary Circulating Counterfeit". The clear inference being to the second usage not the first. But this is often truncated to "Contemporary".

Perhaps it is time to change words.

Personally, I would like to stop using Contemporary in relation to counterfeits and in its place to substitute Contemporaneous Circulating. The definition of that word is a bit clearer to me anyway:

Originating, existing, or happening during the same period of time: e.g., the contemporaneous reigns of two monarchs.

OR

Existing, occurring, or originating during the same time.

Am I being too picky? Is anyone else bothered?

Pillar of the Community
alganbagerap's Avatar
United Kingdom
2490 Posts
 Posted 06/08/2010  7:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add alganbagerap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm not exactly a noobie, more like a reborn. Stopped collecting in '67, started again two years ago; but I've got "bad money" from the 40s & 50s. These were, as Swamperbob says, "Contemporary Circulating Counterfeits". Their purpose then was to pass for cash.
Today, fakes try to pass as collectable coins.
If we're going to split semantic hairs, modern pieces pupporting to be older cannot be "Contemporary", but merely "copies". (And believe me, that's being polite.)
I support the idea of "Contemporaneous Circulating", as it exactly encapsulates the period from which the coin originated.
And it might just confuse the Chinese entrepreneurs for a few months.
Edited by alganbagerap
06/08/2010 7:53 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
Sap's Avatar
Australia
16804 Posts
 Posted 06/08/2010  9:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You're not being too picky. This same issue crops up when time-travel threads are posted; by "contemporary money" do we mean money from our present time, or money from the destination time?

I'm not sure "contemporaneous" would catch on - there's way too many syllables. In the above thread I suggested "period", since that doesn't seem to carry the same ambiguity that "contemporary" does.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 06/10/2010  3:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sap - I do like Period conceptually. It is short and does seem to cover the issue. I also like Circulating or Monetary as "single word" descriptors added to Counterfeit. What ever we chose to call a counterfeit we need to incorporate precision that is lacking in most publications.

Contemporary Circulating Counterfeit has always left me cold - it is simply too long.

Pillar of the Community
Litotes's Avatar
Norway
510 Posts
 Posted 06/11/2010  07:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Litotes to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would certainly welcome more linguistic precision here.

We have essentially three types of forgeries. The ones made almost simultaneously as the original, the ones made significantly later but still meant to enter circulation, and the modern ones only meant to fool collectors. Could we somehow use this in descriptions? A.e. simultaneous counterfeit, later counterfeit and modern counterfeit?
Valued Member
Rayhaldo's Avatar
United States
74 Posts
 Posted 06/11/2010  10:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Rayhaldo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for bringing this up. The use of the word 'Contemporary' has always been confusing to me when describing coins because of the dual definition that can be employed. I do favor more precision otherwise we end up guessing from the context of the statement to discern what the author intends to communicate.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 06/11/2010  11:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Litotes I understand the quest for precision, but I want to give you some of the "exceptions" that cause difficulty.

In the 1980s there was an auction from the estate of a jeweler. This was a family business that had been operating in Massachusetts since about 1800. In the estate, was a pair of dies used to strike Mexican 8R coins and about 50 strikes made from the die pair. The dies sold for a price I could not touch but I did get 4 copies of the strikes made from the dies. The coins had OLD luster very subdued so they had been made some time before the sale but were essentially MINT STATE (or at least "Forger" State). I paid $4 each and figured they were simple Modern Forgeries kind of JUNK - RIGHT?

Wrong - the die type was listed in Riddell's 1845 publication and they were known to exist in circulation in New Orleans prior to that date. The coins were dated 1834. Had I known that fact, I would have bid $10,000 for the dies. But it was too late and the dies are hidden away in an anonymous collection somewhere.

But my question is, what is the correct classification for a forgery known to have existed in the 1840s but for which the dies have survived. Are they Restrikes? And if so, how would anyone ever know that if the dies had not appeared in the same sale?

How many Riddell dies have survived is UNKNOWN but it is NOT many at all. I have only heard of 2 pairs. But I have not examined either pair personally. So I am not aware of the condition of those die pairs - they many no longer be serviceable for coining.

The coins you refer to as

Quote:
ones made significantly later but still meant to enter circulation
are a different situation. I presume you are referring to the Boston type bullion forgeries made 100 or so years after the originals to be used at face value in the China Trade. You could also include the Maria Theresa Thalers made into the middle of the last century in Africa or those made in other unauthorized mints which have the full weight of silver in them.

I have struggled over the years to come up with a simple yet precise enough descriptive term to cover those coins.

I prefer to limit the Number of major categories and include the late dated copies with circulating - perhaps with a note or asterisk.

The best I have come up with to date is a number and letter approach - like an outline format where later refinements add to the identification number. It is not complete and I just created this list off the top of my head but I am leaning toward this approach as the only possible way to be clear and precise.

Class 1 - Contemporaneous Circulating Counterfeit
1A - Coins of Known Age/origin
1A.1 Debased coins Made in the Mint (mint fraud)
1A.2 Coins Made outside the Mint with mint dies
1A.3 Coins made with Transfer Dies Molds
1A.4 Coin made using Fantasy Dies
1A.4.a Barbaric Copies (originated as a class by
Calbetto)
1A.4.b Faithful copies
1B - Coins of Indeterminate age/origin
1B.1 Coins Made outside the Mint with mint dies
1B.2 Coins made with Transfer Dies Molds
1B.3 Coins made using Fantasy Dies
1B.3.a Barbaric Copies

1C - Contemporaneous Issues Non-monetary (but at times
circulated as money)
1C.1 Buttons and Militaria
1C.2 Jewelry
1C2.a Original coins
1C2.b Plated originals
1C2.c Coins created as jewelry
1C.3 Advertising and Medals
1C.4 Play Money
1C.5 Markers, counters

Class 2 - Modern Counterfeits

2A - Numismatic Forgeries (precision copies)
2A.1 Correct Alloy forgeries
2A.2 Off metal copies
2B - Tourist Forgeries (crude and off metal)

Class 3 - Alterations made to Original Coins (Fraudulent Intent)
3A - Clipping or shaving
3A.1 Cutting, clipping
3A.2 Hollowing out - Mining
3B - Plating to pass as something else
3B.1 Plating to change denomination
Racketeer nickels
3B.2 Plating old forgery to pass a 2nd time
3C - Altering Date or variety creation
3C.1 Numismatic value
Three leg Buffalo, added mint mark, altered date
Repaired hole
3C.2 Artistic or Political Satire
Love Tokens, Hobo Nickels, Potty Dollars etc

Class 4 - Non-Fraudulent Intent Issues (possibly used in fraud
at a later time)
4A Museum copies
4A.1 Electrotypes
4A.2 Cast copies ( envision break down by technology)
4B Souvenir Copies
4C School or Training copies


  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,936Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to rattle this change. Forums