| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,263 |
|
New Member
United States
21 Posts |
There is one thing I don't understand and maybe others can help me. If you have a certified coin that you think is undergraded why would some crack it out of the holder and resubmit in the hope for a higher grade when they can just send it in their original holder with no risk of it ever be downgraded. If a coin is graded from the top 4 services based on the coin itself regardless if it is raw or slabbed then why take the chance of cracking it out? Or have people who resubmit undergraded learned that cracking them out and sending them in as raw the coin gets a better chance of being upgraded? It just seems that there can be too much risk cracking a certified coin even though you're hoping it to come back higher it actually gets lowered a notch decreasing it's value. Any help on this subject?
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
why would the PROFESSIONALS want to admit that they made a mistake the first time ? By taking the coin out of the holder the first thing to go is ego !! the second is the opportunity to get fresh unbiased eyes on the coin and the third is your greenbacks that the TPG's are in Business for in the first place. Rick
Edited by Metalman 01/01/2007 3:14 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
that is exactly the reason, if the graders see the coin in the holder they will know what grade they gave it before and they could just throw it in the out box and say it deserves that grade, if it is cracked out they have to regrade it andif you are good at grading then chances are pretty good it will come back upgraded, where chances are slim they will crack it out for you and upgrade it because that would be like admitting they were wrong the first time
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
Yes this is what I thought. There must be some advantage of cracking out a coin which also gives risk of having it downgraded. I don't think that is fair for the TPGs to run things this way. Regardless if a coin is sent raw or slabbed they should look at it and base it's grade on the coin an not the slab. If this is all true this is why I think that maybe it's not good sending like a NGC slabbed coin to NGC in for a regrade cause they would then have to admit they were wrong on grading it in the first place. But maybe switching companies like sending it to PCGS as a crossover so they never graded this coin before and don't have to admit to anything if they upgrade it. I have some certified coins that just look so much better than the same type of coins that were given the same grade. I just don't know should I crack them out and take the risk of an actual downgrade, resend them back to the same company for a regrade, switch companies for a crossover, etc. At about $30 a pop it can get expensive. Like to hear more from others on their opinions on this subject.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
when you send a NGC coin to PCGS then you have the well if we grade it higher than they did that means our standards are lower than theirs so people crack them out in that case also
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1247 Posts |
It's the wonders of the *construct.* Once the public has been properly indoctrinated to believe that only MS65 coins are worth owning that's what they'll try to get. Once the spread between MS64 and MS65 gets high enough or the spread between MS64 and MS63 gets low enough or a combination of the two, the potential risk goes down, the potential reward goes up.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
287 Posts |
I believe what is so important is that the person thinking about resubmitting a coin has done enough research to make sure that the odds are their favor that the coin was not graded properly originally. As colectors we must always try to improve our grading skills. This helps the buyer and seller make fair trasactions.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
470 Posts |
How many coins are you talking about? Crack out 2 and send them in. If you get the desired results...then fine. If you don't...well, that's a lesson in itself. Is it really THAT big of a deal?
It's basically a C.R.A.P. shoot.
Either you have what it takes to play or you don't. I don't. It's not that big of a deal to me. Sure, I've 4-5 slabbed coins that I don't agree with but who am I to question them? Yeah, mistakes happen but at the end of the day, I accept that they are professional and do this for a living. I've got better things to do with my 30 bucks...lol.
Edited by Andrew289 01/02/2007 2:34 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
Hi Andrew The way the market functions on certian coins the difference between a 63 and 64 can be thousands of dollars ,, that seems to me to be the big deal. even in a modest collection 4 or 5 upgrades can escalate the value of the collection by several hundred to several thousand dollars. Now of course that all depends on how the TPG's are viewed,, I personaly believe the coin was the grade it was given before the TPG's charged the money to tell you it was that grade. Seems a little silly to me . I always try to keep things in perspective, I mean the grades from the TPG's are given by a person, that means that just about anyone can learn to grade as accurately and with as much confidence. it all dollars OR sense !! Rick
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I agree, I had almost a full date/mint mark collection of Morgans in MS-64 and if only half of them would have upgraded the price difference between 64 and 65 would be astronomical, take a look at the 1878 B1 Reverse Morgans I am selling right now, in MS-64 they are selling around the 250 range, in MS-65 they are selling in the 1200 dollar range, thats a huge price jump for one grade difference
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
Thanks for the advice to all. I think I'm gonna take a shot and submit some coins. While I may not be the best of graders when you have many coins of the same exact type and clearly some look better than others even though they may have the same certified grade maybe it's worth it to send them back in. From what I understand if you send on a slabbed coin for a REGRADE that this coin is automatically cracked out before the graders see it and regardless what grade they give this coin since it was sent to the same company as the original slab was you are least guaranteed that you will get it reslabbed at the same grade but hopefully higher. But of course when sending it in as a Crossover to a different company the graders must grade it already slabbed and not sure if that would sway their grading opinion. And to send it in raw can be risky cause this wipes out all guarantees of a downgrade that could happen. I'm just trying to figure out is it best to send it in slabbed as a Regrade like a slabbed NGC to NGC, send it in as a Crossover like a slabbed NGC to PCGS or ANACS or crack it out myself and send it in raw to any of the above? Plus since of course these graders know the trend market I wonder if they are swayed by this also. Like if there is not much of a gap between say a MS63 to a MS64 the coin will be upgraded easier than say another coin which shows a major price gap between the two grades. If this is true then that would be unfair all customers since the coin is not being graded based on it's own merit but the market price. Any thoughts on the above?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
if you send on a slabbed coin for a REGRADE that this coin is automatically cracked out before the graders see it and regardless what grade they give this coin since it was sent to the same company as the original slab was you are least guaranteed that you will get it reslabbed at the same grade but hopefully higher.
This is interesting !!! How do they know that it will receive at least the same grade unless they already know the grade it was slabbed at ?
Good luck on your resubmissions .
Rick
|
|
New Member
United States
12 Posts |
I hope I don't step on any toes here, as everything in this thread is correct. I just wanted to add a caution about a particular Grading service. They are called the International Numismatic Bureau of which I have about 20 Commems. All are graded either PR70 or MS70. If the grades were accurate, I could retire from them alone, one coin at a time. With grades of 70, they should not have any visible marks, even under a loupe. Well, with these, no loupe is needed to see the dings and scratches. (Yep, marks are on the coins, and not the holders). So I guess what I'm saying is that many coins are over graded, and easily had on ebay. A good motto or credo is to buy the coin and not the holder. I'm just gratefull they were not more costly then they were. cuedude
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I agree if you can grade buy the coin and not the holder, but if you are new and cant grade then I usually tell people to stick with the big three (PCGS,NGC,ANACS) until you get better at grading yourself then you can go for all the alphabet slabs thats on ebay and pay what you think the coin is worth, not what the slab says
Edited by Bryan1315 01/02/2007 10:29 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
I guess even if they crack it out the coin is first recorded with it's original grade even though the graders don't know it. If by chance it is downgraded cause of it's recorded grade it will still be put in a new holder and given that grade again. I know that sounds strange but sounds pretty fair. I just think that any coin that is already slabbed and graded that this original slabbed grade can sway the graders. Who knows maybe since they have to do so many coins per day for Regrades they just simply glance at it and say Ya looks like a MS64 with a ten second look and passes it on. Now that wouldn't be fair taking a customers $30 for practically doing nothing. I guess the only way to get a new fair grade is cracking them out first and sending them in raw. But as we discussed that could be risky if you are going for an upgrade and get a downgrade instead. Ouch!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts |
. While I may not be the best of graders when you have many coins of the same exact type and clearly some look better than others even though they may have the same certified grade maybe it's worth it to send them back in.From the above statement, I would highly recommend saving your money until your own grading skills have improved. People who have been working the same series for years often find upgrades a stuffshoot, and whether we like to admit it or not, the graders are far more often correct than not. Still, not a super expensive lesson to send a few in, but don't expect any reasons or explainations for grades given either. Have you tried the coin grading section here? Give that a go first, and try to be the first to answer. You will find that while some lower graded coins do have superior eye appeal than many in the next grade up, they most often have a grade limiting factor that may not be as obvious. Now, having said all that, one of the coolest feelings in this hobby is finding that undergraded gem. JMHO. 
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,263 |