| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,697 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1374 Posts |
Edited by Drsandman2 12/30/2011 8:59 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3592 Posts |
I suppose it could happen with a MM punch, but who would know or care.The results would look the same.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1374 Posts |
Actually, I was thinking the opposite. If the punch itself was scratched, it would leave something like a die scratch on the face of the coin. If the cast used to create the punch were scratched, or if the punch were made with some sort of raised anomaly, it would leave something on the coin that would appear to be PMD. This would be separate of isolating dies by RPDs or other identifiers, but identifying them by the punch used. Was there generally one punch for each year, used on each die creating consistency? I've been looking at a lot of IHCs lately... Sorry, I know nothing about the punches themselves. I'm assuming they are very similar to "stamps" used in leatherworking.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
I think they did use 2 different S punches on 1981 SBA, cause there are clear S and filled S varieties.
Edited by Fuzzy317 12/30/2011 11:02 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
on MM there had to be more than one because I know on the Morgans there are small "S" and big "S" and large "O" medium "O" and small "O" with the same dates. So at least back then there were more than one mm punch being used. I am not sure they use punches for MM's in the current days of most everything is being done with machines. Even with the SBA as mentioned above, I am not sure it would have been a punch instead of a computer program that was changed to make the S look different
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
I don't know how all punches were made, but I have read how date punches were made for 19th C. coins like the Indian Head cent. Digits were engraved into a block of tool steel. Then, punches made from soft steel were impressed into the negative digits, creating a positive digit form. The digits were hardened, grouped into a date. Using a small press, the date was impressed into the working die. If the date was positioned incorrectly, they would make a second impression. Afterwards, they would polish down the fields in the area to remove traces of the RPD. I only suspect the polishing was done afterwards because RPDs are more visible inside digits such as 3,6,8,9,0, where the die surface is pushed below the level of the fields. In other cases, when a broken hub or date punch was used, the digit or letter would be fixed directly on the die.
Edited by DVCollector 12/31/2011 3:04 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1374 Posts |
DV - Awesome info, I did not know that they were trying to buff out traces of the RPDs. I have an IHC somewhere around MS that has the top outside of the first 8 missing. As if the number is just incomplete. Another shows what appears to be a very small pin hole in a digit, some digits look rusted although the coin is mint state. As if the punch or die was rusted. Anomalies like this, just make me wonder if something is going on with the punch or die. To be honest, I purchased some 20 IHCs in MS red and red/bn, different dates. They are unslabbed and a third of them are varieties just by looking over the front. I think a couple may actually be proof. I'm starting to have more questions that I know what to do with. I'm pouring over Rick Snow's book best I can... I feel out of my league right now for sure. So... much... to... learn...
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
DV's answer is correct for 18th century and probably some early 19th century punches but I believe they used a different method by the time the Indian Head cents came along. (Although it may still have been used for individual punches) Once the mint had their transfer reduction lathe they started creating date punches in the same way they created die hubs. There is a picture in one of the Gobrecht Journals of a hub with the date 1857 in four concentric circles each date in the same style and each circle the size of a different coin. This hub could then be cut to give you date punches of the exact same style and appropriate size for each denomination. Before 1840 the dates were punched into the dies using individual punches and the different denominations often used different font styles. After 1840 they used a four digit logotype punch and they started standardizing the punches using the same style on all coins. By the 1960's they had things fairly well standardized.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Conder, thanks for the correction!  That is interesting, particularly this excerpt: Quote: This hub could then be cut to give you date punches of the exact same style and appropriate size for each denomination. Would that mean for each and every year, that date punches were created from this one hub, where the date digits are in the same relative position to each other? I ask because I have seen dates on IHCs vary on the distances between digits--for the same year.
Edited by DVCollector 01/01/2012 03:46 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1374 Posts |
DV - If you look at 1881 cents, you will notice the 81 is tilted. Snow notes this in his book with a picture at the beginning of the series. So, the date punch hub for 1881 must have been off. He doesn't say it outright, but alludes that all 1881 cents have this characteristic. Proofs, too. I noticed this just last night.
If you have the book, the first photo he uses is from S5. More interestingly, he notes that the "doubling" under the 1 might be from the digit punch itself. So I guess I'm answering my own question in saying that the punches themselves could create a variety.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1374 Posts |
I have an 1881 cent that to me doesn't look like an RPD, but the date is strange. The top of the first 8 is incomplete, just like S2 but the bottom of the 1s are "doubled like S5". Maybe I'll take some pics.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Yes, good point! I have the Snow guides too, but I'm overseas now and I can't refer to them directly. I also remember some digits being tilted, and other digit defects seen on all business strikes--perhaps proofs too. At the same time, I know of several dates I have studied carefully, where some dies use different punches. The best example I can think of is 1888, where there are several digit styles used on the dies. The "1" digit is different on some dies. I don't know the implications for a "date hub", but now I'm intrigued and will study this again when I get home. Thanks everyone for the stimulating thread!  Quote: The top of the first 8 is incomplete It could be a broken date punch. I seem to recall there was a broken punch in 1881 and 1882 that was repaired. Here is my 1882 with a broken 2 (Snow-2): 
Edited by DVCollector 01/01/2012 10:17 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1374 Posts |
Here we go! I'm also wondering what is going on here with Liberty, if anything. The top left serifs I pointed out seem doubled, and top of the T. The other letters show some of the same, but is not easily seen in the photo. Also, something wiped this coin... but I don't think it was an attempt to clean. By the way, I can't attribute this coin and I plan on sending it to Rick. Give it a go if you want!   
Edited by Drsandman2 01/01/2012 7:32 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
A new master date model would be made each year. This model could then be placed in the reducing lathe and duplicated in the center of a die blank for the size needed for a Three Cent Silver. When the center section was done you leave the cutter where it is, change the reduction ratio, reset the tracing point to a little inside the radius where the date begins on the master design and start again. The cutter will continue moving outward and cut a slightly larger exact copy of the date for say a dime. Change the ratio again and further out on the blank it cuts a larger copy for the quarter. Repeat for the half and dollar. When you are done you have a hub that has five identical copies of the date each one a little larger than the next stacked one above the other smallest in the center and the largest out by the edge. Now cut this hub apart into individual date punches and harden them. This method allows you to have one model and make the correct size punch for any denomination. At eh start of the year you can make all of the punches you need at once, and if a punch breaks or is damaged a new identical punch of the proper size can be created. Just use a smaller die blank and create the one punch you need.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Conder, that's an excellent explanation of how a reducing lathe works. I still need to get out my Snow books and reconcile some differences I remember on IHCs for the same year. Drsandman2, your 1881 is definitely an RPD, and perhaps a DDO as well--I see something on LIBERTY too.  I wish I had my Snow books with me, but I thought I read that a defective "1" digit was used that year. The "horns" above the first 8 are due to a miss-punched 8 being partially polished away--it's unmistakable. If it's not in the Snow books, I hope you have a new variety--and Rick Snow gives you credit for the discovery. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1374 Posts |
Yes, Conder thanks for the explanation. Was this method used in 1881? Wouldn't that make the 81 tilted for all denominations, not just the cent?
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,697 |