Posted 01/03/2012 10:56 pm
That would be "1792", rather than 1702. Your token is an example of what the Americans call "Conder Tokens".
"The Token Book" by Galata Press is probably the cheapest all-in-one-volume British tokens book. It sadly lacks detail on many 1600s types and many varieties of 1700s types, but it's still better than the little 1970 edition I used to rely on.
"The Token Book" by Galata Press is probably the cheapest all-in-one-volume British tokens book. It sadly lacks detail on many 1600s types and many varieties of 1700s types, but it's still better than the little 1970 edition I used to rely on.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
