What I see: I see an area of damage on the reverse, as if it is scraped. I don't see the typical area of weakness. I also see that the coin is bent, as if it was in a devise (which subsequently scratched the reverse). I've never seen a bent (wavy as you say) coin that had a
Cud.
Also, the 'area of weakness' on the reverse from a
Cud would not be broken up into two distinct regions with complete details between them. It would be a uniform area of weakness.
Question: Does the waviness of the coin correspond to these two areas on the reverse that have the design missing? That is, is the coin pressed in exactly where the coin has those those two specific regions of interest on the reverse?
This
Cud is also not in any of my books.
Edited by robbudo
01/07/2012 07:53 am