This coin is so worn that I did not know if it was attributable but I think I may have a match. What do you all think? The wildwinds link is below. The coin that I think is a match is the first thumbnail. http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/claudius_II/t.html
Sometimes we get lucky. In this case the number of rulers from this general period that had a Consecration coin was very small (2) and Victorinus is both rare and did not use an altar reverse so any altar is a Claudius II. If this were any of a hundred other reverses, it would not be so easy to narrow down.
I think that it is wonderful that 1,700 year old coin can attributed with no legend and worn details. I have always liked the patina on this coin; it is very nice green that looks great in hand. Knowing what it is makes me appreciate it just that much more!
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use