Posted 04/24/2012 01:20 am
Hmmm, I actually never bothered to think if it should be considered a commem or not. I can see the argument from both sides. On one hand it is a standard design that has been repeated before, but on the other it is celebrating the SF Mint.
I lean towards saying no just because I never really considered the 20th or 25th anniversary set a commem and I view this set as more of an extension of those than a true commem. Depending on the packaging though the packaging itself could be considered a commem like some of the fine pieces youve shown with your collection.
However it gets designated I am very excited and would love to see some sort of annual ASE set with coins only available through the set
I lean towards saying no just because I never really considered the 20th or 25th anniversary set a commem and I view this set as more of an extension of those than a true commem. Depending on the packaging though the packaging itself could be considered a commem like some of the fine pieces youve shown with your collection.
However it gets designated I am very excited and would love to see some sort of annual ASE set with coins only available through the set
