| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,148 |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Edited by John1
05/07/2012 5:53 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
557 Posts |
Ohh Wow , nice find john1 . Ive seen some with the "peeling" above the letters before .. But not to this extent ... Thanks for sharing , something worth noting for my memory banks .. Phil  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
557 Posts |
Curious , and ment to ask in the first reply - Any chance you could post me up a full coin photo .. Just would be curious of the overall look of the coin .. thanks again for sharing . Phil |
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Thanks Phil, Sure. Also found a 1966 with a lamination on the obverse the same day but is less dramatic then the 1959. John1  Edited by John1
05/07/2012 5:38 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
236 Posts |
Nice delamination John. It is one of the most extreme I've seen, what with it being in two different areas on one side.
Is a lamination considered a mint error and only damage if the lamination is removed post mint (PMD?)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
557 Posts |
Ahh man , thats really a neat one you found there John1 -!! Im curious as well how they view them , is it a PMD error ? I've done alittle research in them , but it didnt fully explain how its labeled other then a "lamination error" .. I always put them aside as I come acrossed them (altho I'm holding very minor peeling in comparison to this :-) .. ) Thanks for updating your post with the photo and again for sharing your find :) .. (me and papatony just picked up a 25$ brick of pennies to look over this week .. seems my morgan addiction fell back a peg haha ) . Cant wait to see whatelse you find buddy >!! Best of luck on your Hunting/Searching .. Phil \m/ |
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
Quote:
Is a lamination considered a mint error and only damage if the lamination is removed post mint (PMD?) A lamination/de-lamination is a mint error caused by a contamination in the alloy mix. If the lamination area is missing it is a de-lamination and still an error. John1 EDIT: http://lincolncentresource.com/Erro...nations.htmlEdited by John1
05/07/2012 6:48 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
236 Posts |
I only use PCGS and what they say is that they will not holder it due to "potential for sealing damage", but say nothing that I could find on how its classified.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2624 Posts |
Lamination is not PMD nor a mint error, it is a planchet error.The lamination is there before the minting begins. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2624 Posts |
Sorry forgot to add very nice find.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
246 Posts |
I like it .. it looks like a doubling on the C thats coming off . nice !!
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,148 |
|
Posted 05/07/2012 5:35 pm
