| Author |
Replies: 82 / Views: 10,593 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
787 Posts |
Okay, I now understand that a bellows setup and a decent lens can produce very nice results versus the dedicated macro lenses.
From your experience, can you offer specific setups for coin photography? I am looking for the decent results on a fixed budget.
Thank You,
Kenscott
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
275 Posts |
Ken I have a Nikon and got an extension tube and am very happy with it. Try googleing extension tube for your camera model and there are some cheep options for you. Bellows are good but unless you spend a bunch they are very cheap. The tube usually has 3 different lengths and will allow different sizes of pics. E-mail me if you want to discuss this more.
There are cheap ones that are manual like the one that I got and ones that will allow for automatic operation but cost alot more.
Edited by Mechman 06/18/2012 12:55 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
627 Posts |
What's your budget? If you already have a copy stand, you can get a nice bellows for around $60-$90 and a very reasonably priced enlarger lens to go with it for around $50 or so (or even much less expensive). I would recommend reading the many threads here regarding this topic. In particular SuperDave and rmpsrpms have offered tons of advice regarding this very topic. If you have the money available, I'd recommend just going the bellows route, and not the extension tubes route. I tried the tubes, and they are simply not flexible enough and are quite clumsy to work with. I ended up going the bellows route, and I couldn't be happier. Bellows vs tubes: https://goccf.com/t/102825El-cheapo lenses: https://goccf.com/t/102384
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
While one chases the dream of a good picture, one is confronted by, the price of the current glass/lenses which are very expensive, and are tailor made for the current camera format...Much like today's computers are tending to feel you are obsolete with your old gear....with computers, this is very true....with lenses, if you have the savy...its NOT TRUE... for the simple fact that, very good lenses have been made for MANY MANY YEARS....50 years plus, the thing of today/ or the most under stood term is "plug and play.....for computers it means the new hardware will work seamlessly as you add it into you computers hardware or perifials, but reality has shown its most likely a real headache we are all to famliar with.. the one thing that has been UNIQUE with cameras, is there are adapters which will allow older lenses with are known to have high qualitys but will not mount to newer camera's, Hence for the UPGRADE idea we all know... THE GOOD NEWS is there are many old lenses with the use of the bellows which will result in very fine Macro pictures for coins with out spending the Megga bucks for the newest lenses out there, at well over $1400 plus bucks meant to be used with the newest high dollar equipment... The bellows is an instrument which will extend the length of the ANY lens...Further from there intended use....with out going into the fact that all cameras, intentions are to have, in general the lens image be in proportion to the image sensors,, this is why there are the 1:1 one to one representaitions for expensive lenses ?YET, the bellows can fine tune an immage, of older lenses just as well as new lenses at far less the costs... For any image it really depends on the shot your trying to achive,,,,this is the most important thing of any lenses attribution or use... coins are a flat surface with a non backround issue...yet the dept of field is so precise, to photo a coin with total focus from rim to center is very hard to do... For a flower one may only want to focus on the very center and care not of the backround.. A bellows offers Extreme veratillity and extreme magnification and clearity of any subject..... and there are adapters which will allow ou to use new or old lenses for you too seek the best picture you can produce, some are limited my make of camera, but here are a host of options for non Nikon or Canon uses 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
787 Posts |
Thanks for the explanation of and information. I was kind of wondering why a bellows was a good choice, and now I understand a bit more of why this is.
I have looked on E-Bay and have found automatic bellows and manual bellows. I have found bellows for older cameras and newer cameras. I have found bellows that have similar descriptions but which vary decently in price depending on the maker.
So, I need to find out a decent automatic bellows for my Canon 450D. Also, I would like suggestions on decent lenses to add to the bellows. I think a bit more digging on previous posts here will help.
Thanks again for all the help.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Quote: I have looked on E-Bay and have found automatic bellows and manual bellows. I have found bellows for older cameras and newer cameras. I have found bellows that have similar descriptions but which vary decently in price depending on the maker.
So, I need to find out a decent automatic bellows for my Canon 450D. Also, I would like suggestions on decent lenses to add to the bellows. I think a bit more digging on previous posts here will help. Don't even try for automatic, there is no need, and in fact would be counterproductive. If your budget allows go with a Nikon bellows, or possibly Canon. Pentax are a good choice as well. Vivitar are a cheaper but good choice. I'd recommend running your choice by the folks here for advice before you buy to possibly save you a lot of time and wasted money. Ray
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
787 Posts |
I will check your links and follow up before I buy.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
787 Posts |
I received my 450D today and have check out the basics. I like this camera already.
It only has around 15,096 shutter actuations so I think it has a lot of life left in it.
Now, to study up a bit.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
They're (probably conservatively) rated for 50k-ish actuations.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
I've been following several topics addressing photographing coins. I have been using a Canon G9 with a Raynox DCR-250 super Macro Lens and (2) Jansjo lights and not getting the results I want. I am trying to decide between the Canon 450D and the T1i. And between a bellows system and just a 100mm macro lens. I find myself getting lost trying to follow the terminology with the bellows setup. Therefore, I am leaning toward the macro lens, if the price difference is not too large. I am going to buy used on ebay for all items. If it is not too much trouble, could someone give me a general cost breakdown of the items that I would need for both setups. I am taking images of GSA $1 in original holders exclusively. Thanks for helping out.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
787 Posts |
Can I ask the benefit of bellows over extension tubes?
It has been some years since I shot and then I just used dedicated lenses.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote:
Can I ask the benefit of bellows over extension tubes? An extension tube will give you a specific amount of magnification directly related to its' length. And you still have to buy more- or less-expensive lenses either built for or adapted to that manufacturer's mount. A bellows, whose length changes, is capable of a wide range of magnification. You can play with a hundred different lenses at a thousand different magnifications on a bellows. Many of those lenses will be significantly cheaper than anything you could use with an extension ring; $20-30 will buy you a lens which will give results indistinguishable from a $500 dedicated macro lens. Extension tubes give you a specific improvement in one direction. A bellows broadly expands both your options and your capabilities.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
From a previous post...
The advantage of the bellows is you can adjust the magnification in fine increments. Let's say you want to exactly fill the viewfinder with a Dollar. You can do that with the bellows. This assumes the lens is long enough and/or the bellows has short enough minimum distance to get the magnification you need.
Tube extensions do the same thing as the bellows except they can't be adjusted in fine increments. You need to accept the magnifications the different combinations give you. If the combinations give you what you want, all's good. But this is a big disadvantage if you want to shoot a Dollar and the magnification is just a little too high and makes the Dollar over-fill the finder, while the next adjustment down only half-fills the finder. You can mitigate this by buying a longer lens, which will give you finer adjustment for the same tube lengths. But you may need to buy two sets of extenders to get enough extension for smaller coins or varieties.
Fixed magnification is actually an advantage in the sense that it is easy to precisely go back to a fixed magnification setting. Your Dollars will all be the same size for every shot. This can save a lot of time, but only works if you can find that just-right length of extensions you are satisfied with.
One more comparison: bellows have integrated tripod mounts, but most extension tubes do not. This means you will need to mount the camera rather than bellows to the tripod or copy stand. So if you use the camera dedicated for coin photos, no problem. But if you are like me, and use the camera for other purposes, swapping back and forth becomes tedious and requires re-calibrating flatness and other parameters each time I want to take a shot. The fixed bellows setup is easy to swap the camera on and off and maintains its settings.
The risk you take with bellows is that your magnification will be too high because your lens is too short or bellows minimum length is too long. If you were mostly imaging Cents, this is no problem. But I've had issues with some bellows not being able to image Dollars with shorter lenses. From my experience, 75mm is about the shortest you can go with most bellows and still image Dollars. I have one bellows that won't work for Dollars with anything shorter than 80mm. So if you go the bellows route, and don't want to take the risk, 105mm is a safer bet. The longer lens will also give you more working distance and thus lighting flexibility.
Ray
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
787 Posts |
Okay, so I am seeing that extension tubes and bellows both allow for a shorter focal distance thus stripping the infinity.
Yet, the bellows allow for multiples lengths and a wide variety of lenses while extension tubes are a set length and must have specific lenses which match them.
So, personally, I will want a bellows for my indoor shooting of coins and other small, fine detail items. For on-the-go shooting I might want to get a decent pair of extension tubes already compatible with my 450D and it's current lens.
Everyone, thank you. I am learning here.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
627 Posts |
Ken, You are in the right place. Ray and SuperDave are the most patient and best teachers around. I went from shooting with a point and shoot with "okay" images, to now having requests from people to image their coins when I post coin images on other forums. Take their advice, read the threads here in the Coin Photography section, and you will be up and running in no time. Ray and Dave are saints....they never tire of answering and re-answering the same questions....not to mention linking you to great items on ebay for great prices! Cheers, -Brandon
Edited by brg5658 06/20/2012 8:13 pm
|
| |
Replies: 82 / Views: 10,593 |