| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,982 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
516 Posts |
Broke this one out of a PCGS holder that I thought was undergraded for my 7070. Interested to see how you guys grade it.  
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3294 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I will guess AU-53. Beautiful coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3184 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Only the tiniest amount of wear on the high points. AU58. Nice even patina.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
AU58. Beautiful Seated Half.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36800 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7194 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1064 Posts |
AU-58, and a beautiful coin for your set!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3843 Posts |
I'm in the AU-58 crowd. Very nice coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
620 Posts |
AU-58 maybe a old cleaning on the obverse
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
516 Posts |
I agreed with you guys. PCGS slabbed it as an AU50. I had it pegged at a 55.
Thanks everyone.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Quote: I agreed with you guys. PCGS slabbed it as an AU50. I had it pegged at a 55.
Thanks everyone.
nwc coin: Your coin looks better than a 50. I wonder if it was net graded 5 points down for the marks in the obverse field? Either way, you have a very nice example of a Liberty Seated Half there!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
If you picked this up at AU50 or less cost, you made out in my opinion. 
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,982 |