| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,504 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
477 Posts |
I heard that Ron Paul wants to buy us back on the gold standard I think he may get my vote just so I can aquire massive amounts of silver coins what are you thoughts about going back to silver coinage, I would love to and think it's a great idea and it means more pm for me my precious, my precious, my precious 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
834 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
How does it mean more PM's for you?...Not following the logic.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1731 Posts |
I think he means that if silver goes back into circulation that he would get more silver coins?
I dont think that will happen. Say the US makes the coins 90% silver like they did before, it would cost them $2 to make a 10 cent coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
Dr. Pauls position states: Quote: "I wouldn't exactly go back on the gold standard but I would legalize the constitution where gold and silver should and could be legal tender, which would restrain the Federal Government from spending and then turning that over to the Federal Reserve and letting the Federal Reserve print the money."[65]  ^ Interview with Ron Paul after New Hampshire presidential debate on June 5, 2007. Available on YouTube: [1]
Edited by amida17 07/29/2012 7:21 pm
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16834 Posts |
Quote: I heard that Ron Paul wants to buy us back on the gold standard I think he may get my vote just so I can aquire massive amounts of silver coins You appear to be confusing the gold standard with the silver standard. They are two separate things. It's entirely possible for a country to be on the gold standard but not issue any silver circulating coins. Most of the world was under such a system up until 1971. Quote: what are you thoughts about going back to silver coinage, I would love to and think it's a great idea and it means more pm for me A return to the silver standard has been discussed ad nauseam on the forum before. As much as many folks would like it to happen, it just can't happen - there's not enough silver to go around any more. As for more PM for you, the answer would still be "no". If the government continued to issue base-metal coinage side-by-side with the silver coin, the silver coin would be hoarded and you would never find it in circulation. You can't beat Gresham's Law. The US government can't even issue a new base-metal circulating $1 coin properly; how do you think a circulating silver coin would fare any better?
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3692 Posts |
Is he even campaigning anymore? The media completely ignored his momentum. I really hope he appears on your ballot card. The only news we get up here is the Obama/Romney campaigning. Both are dolts if you ask me. Ask me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1454 Posts |
Quote: The only news we get up here is the Obama/Romney campaigning. Both are dolts if you ask me. That's why I'm not sure we'll see much of a change in the PM markets when the choice is between a rino or a donkey.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
477 Posts |
Well if ron paul becomes president gold and silver will become tender which opens whole new windows of opportunity in buy pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1126 Posts |
SAP Said, Quote: As much as many folks would like it to happen, it just can't happen - there's not enough silver to go around any more. And most people have no idea how very true that statement is. With the ever increasing uses of Silver in the Electronics and the Medical Fields and then just being disposed of into local land fills. Among other serious supply demand fundamentals, Silver is the Metal for me 
Edited by stewart 08/05/2012 5:29 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2269 Posts |
As much as I would like to see our currency return to silver, I don't see this happening for many of the reasons already stated. The price of silver would cost the government way too much money to produce coinage. Even if silver was used again in circulating coinage, they would never make it past the bank because they would immediately be plucked from circulation.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
135 Posts |
If the dollar is adjusted to be at or slightly more then the base metal content, then people will be less likely pluck the currency from circulation. This is the reason people don't collect zinc or steel coins, the face value is above the metal content value.
Even steel or zinc coins could be plucked from circulation if the fiat face value weakens in relation to the value of the metal. Having your dollar tied directly to silver (or gold) avoids this.
As far as not having enough physical metals to make coinage, I think it's doable. First of all, the "one dollar" has inflated to around $27 today. (Whatever silver closed at last.) So in effect when you return to silver, you will be removing 26 out of 27 dollars, so there is no need to create wasted dollars. You would see prices instantly adjust to what some of the older crowd here remembers, (you can buy gum for a nickel, a $26,000 car today will cost $1000 etc.)
Also you can make a bi-metal coin similar to a Toonie, that has the precious metal suspended in some other base metal. We also have other metals to consider, like titanium, palladium, platinum etc, ad various alloys.
You still have the infrastructure in place for producing coin. Silver won't cost the government anymore then stamping a zinc penny. It should cost less, your money is supposed to be already in the Federal Reserve. Your mint would save money by not having to produce disposable coins, like zinc and steel. Plus they will be producing a much smaller number, a ratio of 1:26 face dollars vs today.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4008 Posts |
On the 3rd hand, if the dollar collapses and silver & gold coinage from years gone by are the ONLY real money available, they WILL be used in the exchange of goods and services, all of their other real and suspected problems notwithstanding.
Not everything that happens does so because of planning. Some are the results of gigantic screw-ups.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,504 |
|