| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 997 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
86 Posts |
This 1902 O is actually graded from NAC, please give me your opinions on this one...  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Very nice coin I would say MS-64+ with a shot at 65
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36806 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1436 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
MS64 also. Just curious, what did NAC grade it?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
86 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36806 Posts |
Thats why you don't buy the odd ball TPG coins unless you can grade the coin for yourself.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
86 Posts |
I bought it on ebay, only paid the price of a MS62
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
86 Posts |
I didn't think it was an MS66, there's a big jump from 64 or 65 to 66. I was hoping it was a 63 or 64.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36806 Posts |
If you got it for 62 money, you did good.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Always buy the coin not the label on the holder. Especially true when not a top TPG. For MS62 money it looks like a good deal.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: If you got it for 62 money, you did good That's an anomaly in a NAC holder - a coin they call Mint State which is actually Mint State.  I'm thinking 64-ish, 65 a distinct possibility.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
620 Posts |
I agree with those that thought Ms-64 to me MS-64 with a star or a green bean You have a very nice Morgan.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2541 Posts |
MS 64 - a nice looking coin and if you got it for a good price then it tastes even better!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 997 |
|