| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,424 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2202 Posts |
Some of my older type coins in my 7070 album are slightly smaller than the holes (probably due to wear) such that they end up rotating inside the holes.
I'm sure others have experienced this. What have you done to anchor your coins inside the holes to keep them from rotating?
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1424 Posts |
cut a small strip of paper or plastic and lay it along the edge of the hole to wedge the coin in place.
Edited by bmanofnbc 11/01/2012 8:58 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
Yes, that's what I did. You can see them if you look at my Large Cents in my 7070 pictures linked below.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
this has been discussed many times on this forum, what I did was just cut some shims out of a 2x2 safe-t-flip thin enough where I could curve them around the coin and the inserts still fit in the album. The reason the holes are bigger than some of the coins is because the tolerances were different between the years. One year will be bigger than then next so I imagine they chose the largest it could be and made the holes that size
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2202 Posts |
Bryan, yeah I figured that in addition to wear, the standards for exact size weren't as rigidly enforced back then (probably because they didn't have the technology).
Ken, see that, got it. I was planning on doing the same thing, though I was hoping someone had come up with a more elegant solution!
BTW, I was floored when I saw your 1810 Large cent--I filled up that hole with an 1810 cent that looks almost exactly the same--and it arrived in the mail today!
Edited by jpsned 11/01/2012 9:21 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
225 Posts |
I have the opposite problem with my favorite coin....the one I use for the avatar, the 1807 capped bust half... It is too large in circumfrance to fit in the Turban head 1807-36 Slot. Extremely furstrating and I gunked up the page trying to hone out the hole....
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
Dansco used to offer shims like the ones I made out of the flip, you just had to mail them that you wanted or needed them but they should have included them in the albums in my opinion. I don't think they do this anymore but justcarl may know for sure
tjmcman, I remember one of my coins being tight but I didn't have to modify the album to make it fit. I thought I was going to have to and I believe it was with the lettered edge capped bust. The one in mine was a 1832, I guess the earlier ones are larger than the later ones like the one I used
|
|
Valued Member
United States
225 Posts |
Bryan, I was able to fit an1826. This 1807 just doesn't want to fit in anything I've got for halves. It's being stored in a plastic dollar holder at this time. It seems the bust halves have a great deal of variation to them.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
Quote: I thought I was going to have to and I believe it was with the lettered edge capped bust. The 1827 Capped Bust half dollar in my 7070 is the only coin I have ever had any difficulty getting into the hole. I had to work the opening to widen it up a bit before I could get her in there.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
Jpsned -
I was really happy to get that 1810. It is not corroded and although it has quite a bit of wear, I think it looks good in the album. I got it and the 1800 Large Cent from a guy for $50. Bought them sight unseen based on a couple of other purchases from him and was thrilled when I got them. Honestly, I think it was mainly a nice gesture from a fellow collector.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Why do the early coins have problems fitting well in the holes? If you think about how they were made the answer is simple. I could say the answer is left for an exercise fore the student but I won't.
Remember that before 1836 the coins were not struck in a tight fitting collar. (The reeded edge coins had a collar snup enough to make the reeding show on the coins but not a 'tight" fit.) At that time the collar was mainly used to try and center the planchet and keep it from falling off the lower die. Since the collar did not restain the expansion of the coin during the strike, the final diameter of the coin was determined by the strength of the strike and the softness of the metal. This means that every pre-1836 coin in a given series is a slightly different size than all the others. Typically they can range in diameter from smallest to largest by about 1 to 1.5 mm. Now how do you make a hole in an album for coins that vary that much in diameter? What you do is measure a random sample of the coins and determine what the most commonly seen size is and make the hole to fit that size. The average coin will now fit, but there will still be a fair number that will be loose and some that you will have to booger the page to get them in. After 1836 and the close collars all the coins are a given size and creating holes that fit them well is easy. The Matron head large cent is a real problem because the design range used in the album (1816 - 1839)overlaps the changeover date from loose to close collars. If you make the hole fit the 36 -39 coins many of the 16 - 36 coins won't fit into the hole. If you make it fit the early years (Which still can't be done because of varying size) then the later years will all be loose and rotate. It is a problem with no good solution.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
Have 'em slabbed...problem solved!  Sorry...I could not resist!  I have a Coronet Large Cent 1816-39 type that is smaller and the Draped Bust Large Cent 1796-1807 is a just a smidgen larger than the holes in my 7070 "deception" album. Maybe I have a "knock-off" Dansco?
Edited by oih82w8 11/07/2012 09:38 am
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,424 |
|