Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Nickels From 1867 For Grading

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 872Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
maudry's Avatar
Luxembourg
588 Posts
 Posted 04/04/2007  2:04 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add maudry to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hi here is a couple of Nickels from 1867.
The first coin shows still some strong luster which doesn't appear on the scan. But it also starts to have some serious signs of wear and worse several spots probably resulting from verdigris. Without those spots I would grade it XF45, in that state around a small VF?
It has probably been minted from fresh dies.


Image: Nickels-From-1867-For-Grading nickel1867-1.jpg
67.68 KB

I'm not familiar with US grading, so all opinions are wellcome
The second coin has a little dull luster shows only little wear and has a die crask. I think it is AU50.
It has obviously been minted from tired dies.


Image: Nickels-From-1867-For-Grading nickel1867-2.jpg
71.54 KB
Pillar of the Community
hunter20ga's Avatar
United States
1173 Posts
 Posted 04/04/2007  3:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hunter20ga to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't have my grading books at hand, so will have to offer only a guess on these nickels, but...that said, I would agree that the first coin has VF characteristics and the second is AU 50. The first coin, because of the spotting wouldn't command the full value for its grade. Still...getting good examples of the Shield nickels nowadays isn't always easy.

Pretty neat die crack on the second one. You claim tired dies, and that is obvious for the reverse of this coin, but the stars on the front look very evenly struck, which is not always the case. The obverse rim of the second nickel has an unuaual appearance between 3 and 6 o'clock. Is that after mint damage? Could you give us a better view?

Nice coins.
Edited by hunter20ga
04/04/2007 3:14 pm
Pillar of the Community
Jaobler's Avatar
United States
6394 Posts
 Posted 04/04/2007  3:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jaobler to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hello Maudry,
I'd say your first coin is choice VF, almost XF in terms of wear. The corrosion spots will of course lower the value. I would be a bit concerned that the corrosion could spread and cause further damage. I wonder if any forum members have any suggestions for stabilizing the coin surfaces so the corrosion doesn't get worse.

I agree the second coin probably deserves an AU grade. The obverse rim irregularities from 3 to 6 o'clock are as-struck features caused by broken die edges. Small Cuds like these are pretty common on Shield nickels.
Valued Member
Phoenix21's Avatar
United States
194 Posts
 Posted 04/04/2007  11:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Phoenix21 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think you graded them pretty accuratly. I go about the same on both of them, VF and AU.

Phoenix
Pillar of the Community
maudry's Avatar
Luxembourg
588 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2007  07:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add maudry to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for your opinions! Do the die cracks and broken edges have any influence on the coin value?
Pillar of the Community
hunter20ga's Avatar
United States
1173 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2007  09:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hunter20ga to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Die cracks and Cuds...sometimes affect value for some collectors. If the coin is recognized as a variety, then die cracks, etc. can increase value by increasing collector demand. If not seen as a variety, then there's probably little effect on price either way, though a "purist" may avoid such coins. Personally, I think these "beauty marks" add flavor and interest to coins, especially those American coins from the 1790's through the nineteenth century. Of more importance to me is the strike quality and detail of the engraving. But, as in all things numismatic, it is a matter of personal preference and opinion more than anything else!
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 872Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to rattle this change. Forums