Hi,

From what I can see both of these coins featured side-by-side above are .9 fine and supposedly have an AU grade listed under the same Krauss # 521.
As I previously indicated in this thread my all around expertise with these types of coins is limited.
So I would like to know the answers to the following questions:
a) Why does the square sectional view of the left photo above have a lighter surface on the 1910-J coin initially featured in this thread compared to a similar 1911-A coin on the right which is shown in its entirety in the URL below?:
http://www.coinfactswiki.com/wiki/P...11-A_20_markb) What could be the cause of the apparently pocked marked surface on the left 1910-J coin and why did this defect(IMHO) not cause this coin to be graded at a lower level compared to the smoother surfaced, deeper golden-colored 1911-A coin on the right?
c) As a comparison when using US gold coins, the 0.90 fine Au(gold) designation implies a compositional balance of 10% Cu(copper) so
a. Is the 10% non-gold component of these Prussian-German coins also composed of 100% copper? and
b. Is this 10% non-gold component of these Prussian-German coins 'usually' uniformly mixed throughout the coin similar to US gold coins also minted in the early 1900s? and
c. Is it even conceivably possible that this pocked mark surface on the 1910-J coin above is the probable end result of its 10% non-gold compositional portion having accidentally migrated (during an antiquated minting process w/o any consistent QC procedures) to the surfaces of both sides of the coin and then later having reacted to a harsh acid cleansing by someone trying to make the coin look better for resale...? and finally
d. Does any evidence currently exist supporting the supposition that the Hamburg, 'J' mint, at times utilized a different grade of gold compared to the mint at Berlin designated by an 'A'?
Just thinking out loud :)
mdpmedia