Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Found This In A Jar!

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 3,321Next Topic
Page: of 2
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10460 Posts
 Posted 03/11/2013  5:43 pm  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The photos are not good enough to really say anything.... however, I will say this statement is NOT true:


Quote:
...whether it had first been stamped by a dime press...


Due to the collar dies, it is impossible to strike a larger diameter coin in a press set up for smaller diameters. That is why you see 1-cent coins struck on 10-cent planchets, but not vice-versa. The collar of the 10-cent press would have to be disassembled entirely, for this to happen, then you would have a broadstruck coin.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Edited by SPP-Ottawa
03/11/2013 5:43 pm
Valued Member
bobberbear's Avatar
Canada
84 Posts
 Posted 03/12/2013  12:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bobberbear to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yeah, the dime strike thought was just me grasping at straws. I actually think the planchet had to have gone into the press damaged. I looked at it through 20X magnifying glasses and there is no other image on the coin. It's odd. It looks like a fallen cake would look like if you slammed the oven door while baking. Do you think it's possible someone slammed the oven door on this coin? (lol) I'm really tempted to try to clean the coin of those stains, especially on the obverse but I don't want to destroy any of it's value. It's back in it's homemade 2 X 2 and stapled into a binder until I can figure out what to do with it. It will remain in the collection no matter what!
Pillar of the Community
DavidZerbato's Avatar
United States
1081 Posts
 Posted 03/12/2013  1:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DavidZerbato to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't think the plancet was damaged before going in. IMO, if it was, the strike would have been much weaker where the indentation is and there is no way that a bulge would remain on the obverse.
Valued Member
bobberbear's Avatar
Canada
84 Posts
 Posted 03/12/2013  2:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bobberbear to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If you are suggesting the damage occurred after market then I would think there would be damage to the image or lettering. It's a circular indentation that goes out as far as the rim on the left side of the coin yet there isn't even a nick on any of the denticles or lettering. The beaver tail remains full without a nick and there isn't a hair out of place on the beaver's body! It's very difficult for me to believe that I could take an object of some sort and smash down without even minor damage to the image or anything inside the strike zone! I'm open to suggestion. As I said earlier, I found another nickel dated 1994 with similar but not as drastic damage as this coin exhibits. The '94 is also dirtier which stands to reason because it was in circulation whereas the '84 was not. In the meantime I'll see what I can do to get better photos of the '84.
  Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 3,321Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums