Does anyone know the reason that the 2008 Red Book has the 1999W $5 Tenth-Ounce Gold Proof valued at $170 compared to the 2007 value of $100. The 1998W proof had a mintage of 20,000 and is valued at $110 but the 1999W proof has a mintage of 48,426 and if valued much higher. I know someone here will know or have a reason for the difference in price. Also, are the more recent years with lower mintage going to be worth more in your oppinion?
Doc, I noticed another error in the book, one of the $10 Indian Eagles was overpriced by $300 or so. There was a thread last week, a couple of folks were discussing other errors in the book as well. So much for proofreading before going to press, eh?
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use