Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Barber Quarter, Part Of Obverse Design On Reverse

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 1,833Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
BillSnyder's Avatar
778 Posts
 Posted 07/04/2013  5:18 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add BillSnyder to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers

I think that this is a real Mint error, not a home-made pressing. What do you think?



Barber-Quarter,-Part-Of-Obverse-Design-On-Reverse

Barber-Quarter,-Part-Of-Obverse-Design-On-Reverse

Barber-Quarter,-Part-Of-Obverse-Design-On-Reverse

(I'm thinking that this coin was struck through a struck fragment).


Bill
Pillar of the Community
robbudo's Avatar
United States
2757 Posts
 Posted 07/04/2013  7:36 pm  Show Profile   Check robbudo's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add robbudo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm very suspicious that this is real. BUT, are the star impressions on the reverse the same size as the stars on the obverse? And those two 'letter'-impressions on the reverse, could those be part of the date of an obverse fragment?

Maybe you can overlay the reverse area of question over the obverse and see if it lines up perfectly with the 3 stars and the 18 of the date.
Edited by robbudo
07/04/2013 7:39 pm
Pillar of the Community
BillSnyder's Avatar
778 Posts
 Posted 07/04/2013  7:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BillSnyder to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Yes, the stars in both places are the same size. Also, the date numerals (rather the parts of numerals) are the same size as those on the obverse. (I am sorry that my rather old images are not all in the same size).

Yes, an overlay would be a good idea. Thanks for the thought.
Pillar of the Community
robbudo's Avatar
United States
2757 Posts
 Posted 07/04/2013  7:54 pm  Show Profile   Check robbudo's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add robbudo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
the overlay would be fairly convincing.
Pillar of the Community
philadelphian's Avatar
United States
3253 Posts
 Posted 07/04/2013  7:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add philadelphian to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looks to be a partial brockage. Known to happen in the Barber line. But I don't know if the reverse image should even appear with a brockage.
Edited by philadelphian
07/04/2013 8:07 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 07/04/2013  8:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm having a hard time coming up with a scenario under which this could have happened at the Mint; I'm not expecting a fully-struck reverse with an obverse brockage. With that said, the location of the new impression is exactly where one would expect it in such a situation.
Pillar of the Community
philadelphian's Avatar
United States
3253 Posts
 Posted 07/04/2013  8:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add philadelphian to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
How about two stacked coins, and a good, solid blow?
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 07/04/2013  8:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
How about two stacked coins, and a good, solid blow?


That would work, but only post-Mint. If the "good solid bow" were performed by the press, it'd be a full-on brockage. If it were - for some reason - a fragment of a planchet instead of a full one, the reverse strike would be obliterated wherever the original piece of planchet was. And a "strip" of planchet only large enough to create the impresison shown would still kill the denticles in that area. For this coin, it had to be allowed to receive a full reverse strike, and then that impression had to be created as a second step.

Which is why I think it's postmint.
Pillar of the Community
westcoin's Avatar
United States
9792 Posts
 Posted 07/06/2013  04:51 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add westcoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm with SsuperDdave on this one, a partial brockerage it might be. Strange error if proven to be real and not post mint made. Never seen anything quite like it before.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013!
ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector.

See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
Rest in Peace
pyrbob's Avatar
United States
1943 Posts
 Posted 07/06/2013  6:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pyrbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm with PMD. It doesn't look like any partial brockage I have seen before. Another coin was pressed into this one.
Pillar of the Community
BillSnyder's Avatar
778 Posts
 Posted 07/06/2013  6:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BillSnyder to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

It doesn't look like any partial brockage I've ever seen either.

PMD?

Anyway, I'm not convinced either way. I have trouble with the "pressed into another coin" theory because there are no depressions beside the incuse elements.


Cheers,
Bill
Pillar of the Community
westcoin's Avatar
United States
9792 Posts
 Posted 07/12/2013  01:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add westcoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would have loved to see this coin before it was worn down. The mere fact of the wear, might mean it was PMD and the circulation wear hid the PMD to the point that all that is left is what we see now. Still weird and interesting. I'm going to send this thread link to a good friend that is an expert in this type of error and see what he says.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013!
ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector.

See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
Pillar of the Community
westcoin's Avatar
United States
9792 Posts
 Posted 07/14/2013  12:22 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add westcoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Okay got a reply back from my good friend Mike Ellis, some may know him from CONECA, where he the current Vice President, and past President (1995-2000) and he is currently serving his second term as an ANA board member, Mike is an expert on mint error coinage, and along with Fred Weinberg - my go to source on error questions. He has taught many ANA Summer Seminar courses on minting errors over the past several decades. He graciously allowed me permission to post the following to you regarding this perplexing error coin being discussed here at CCF.

From Michael Ellis:

"Hello Everybody! Westcoin brought this coin to my attention asking my thoughts on it. To me, it is evident that it is PMD and 3 coins were likely used to do. A sandwich if you will. Though this one is very sharp, this type of damage is fairly common. The final piece of evidence appears on the coin in question but on the obverse. If you will review the obverse image, look at the denticles from about 6:30 to 7:30. That line is an impression from coin number 3 of an unknown denomination or series. Someone may measure the degree of the curvature of the arc and figure that out. I am willing to bet that this area of the edge is minutely thinner than the rest of the edge from the pressure applied in impart the stars in question.

It is really cool for what it is and would make a great educational piece."

Thanks for sharing your valuable opinion with the CCF Mike!
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013!
ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector.

See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
Edited by westcoin
07/14/2013 12:29 am
Valued Member
1916 D Merc's Avatar
United States
459 Posts
 Posted 07/14/2013  01:12 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1916 D Merc to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very interesting piece! Surprised it only took an expert a very short time to figure out what this was. I guess that's why we call them experts.
  Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 1,833Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.36 seconds to rattle this change. Forums