Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1832 Lima Peru 8R - Guess The Grade

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 2,488Next Topic
Page: of 2
Bedrock of the Community
DVCollector's Avatar
United States
10045 Posts
 Posted 08/01/2013  5:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DVCollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
realswatcher, yeah--I just posted that for conversation sake--since I have no idea how these grade.
I should have posted an AU50 for direct comparison, such as this one (from Heritage too)

1832-Lima-Peru-8R---Guess-The-Grade
Pillar of the Community
MathieuMa's Avatar
France
1591 Posts
 Posted 08/02/2013  03:58 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MathieuMa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wow, that one is very well struck !
I just wish it wouldn't have been dipped (at least) ... how can such old coins come out "as new" like this ... silver don't stay un-oxidized for centuries.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 08/02/2013  06:18 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yeah, definitely dipped... but sometimes that's for a reason. The coin could have had patchy and/or ugly tone - I highly doubt the piece had nice cabinet tone and someone said "ewww, yuck" and whipped out the Jeweluster. If the piece has sufficient luster still remaining under truly undesirable tone, sometimes it's better to strip and start over.

Back to the original point, even allowing for weak strike on the original ebay piece... the grade difference based on wear for these two "AU 50" pieces is comical. The MOST you could allow here is that maybe one could argue the dipped example is "AU plus" detail and they silently "net graded" it down a notch b/c of the dip? Still, the two pieces are worlds apart for wear.
Pillar of the Community
MathieuMa's Avatar
France
1591 Posts
 Posted 08/02/2013  06:56 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MathieuMa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Another reason why I hate slabs. I can understand on very high grade coins, or modern ones... but for ancients ...
Unless particularly expensive ones where the slab gives an extra insurance.
Bedrock of the Community
DVCollector's Avatar
United States
10045 Posts
 Posted 08/02/2013  1:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DVCollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I noticed the dipping too. I guess the TPGs slab some dipped coins, but not others?
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 08/02/2013  3:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The question is typically whether the "look" of the bathed coin is "market acceptable"... That 1832 is very borderline - maybe the luster pops more in hand than in the Heritage scan (where it looks basically "dipped out"... Also, they're usually a bit more lenient with older material - I'd say that a common late 1800's Cap & Ray or a typical Morgan with that stripped of a surface might not grade problem-free.

No one really "likes" slabs (that is, having a coin locked in a slab). If done correctly (nearly perfect on Counterfeit Detection, noting cleaned/altered surfaces, proper evaluation of the degree of wear), they definitely serve a purpose on theory. That's why the initial "AU 50" in the thread is bothersome... undermines credibility.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 08/02/2013  8:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Want to see something else REALLY annoying from a TPG (third-party grader) involving this series? This is the 2nd time I've seen this egregious error on a slab label... mistakenly attributing the common 1828 Lima LARGE Liberty figure style as the MUCH rarer SMALL Liberty. This is a ridiculous error for anyone who know these at all - complete different appearance, and a HUGE error in terms of value... Krause indicates this spread, and I can tell you I've only seen one or two actual 1828 small Liberty pieces.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...271247700708

  Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 2,488Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change. Forums