Posted 10/21/2013 6:04 pm
I'm not sure what to really say about it. It's going to be difficult to accurately attribute this coin, because the level of wear tends to mask whether the reverse defect is a planchet flaw or postmint damage which was then softened by circulation. The fact that there's still viable rim on the outside of the "bad" area is encouraging for it as a planchet error, but inconclusive. Hopefully a little action in this thread will bring out more readers and more opinions.
