Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Which One Would You Pick?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 33 / Views: 3,544Next Topic
Page: of 3
Pillar of the Community
longnine009's Avatar
United States
1247 Posts
 Posted 07/08/2007  7:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add longnine009 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It's an fascinating situation Amazon. I remember someone in CU a few years back offered $1,000 for a POOR1 Ike for a registry set.

It's probably true that collectors will seek the highest quality in coins that they can afford. These POOR1 or FAIR2 coins for registry sets and the prices they go for would suggest me that perceived quality isn't carved into a grading number.

Valued Member
valutarick's Avatar
Netherlands
376 Posts
 Posted 07/18/2007  2:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add valutarick to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
1892 (FR) has 950.000 and 1893 has 1.550.000 emitted number of coins.

I have the 1892 and 1893 version in an nearly uncirculated condition. The 1892 I paid for 8 US dollars, the 1893 5 US dollars. In Holland America is very cheap...
Edited by valutarick
07/18/2007 2:55 pm
Pillar of the Community
arthrene's Avatar
United States
1713 Posts
 Posted 07/18/2007  5:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add arthrene to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
MS for me, but my eyes are bad and I need to detail to see.
Jim


I like being able to read them too.
Valued Member
kenny_1745's Avatar
United States
239 Posts
 Posted 07/19/2007  10:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kenny_1745 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would buy the MS63 crack it out of its holder and resubmit it
Pillar of the Community
thq's Avatar
United States
3343 Posts
 Posted 07/20/2007  2:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add thq to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nobody ever circulates a commem! A great pocket piece, but not my first choice for $65. Any number of rarer gouged and worn coins out there. I guess I'd take the MS coin and stick it in my pocket, maybe 50 years from now it would look like the 1892.
"Two minutes ago I would have sold my chances for a tired dime." Fred Astaire
New Member
Stone's Avatar
United States
16 Posts
 Posted 07/22/2007  10:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Stone to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The FR-02, then crack it and keep it in my pocket for about 3 months to make it a PO-01.
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 07/23/2007  12:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
Nobody ever circulates a commem!


I would have to disagree with that. Modern commems may not circulate, but the older commems saw alot of circulation. A non-pocketpiece FR-02 might be a bit of a stretch but I have seen plenty of VF-XFs. Columbians that didnt sell at the Chicago Fair for $1 were dumped into circulation at face value afterwards and many saw quite a bit of circulation. Many of the more common commems also spent quite a bit of time in commerce.
Valued Member
United States
157 Posts
 Posted 07/23/2007  12:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ziggy29 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This is the insanity of the PCGS "Low Ball" registry. Personally I think it's irresponsible to reward lower grades with more registry points, because I believe we should be preserving our coins for the future generations of collectors, not intentionally wearing them down for more registry points. It's just another gimmick of many that the slabbers are using to get more coins slabbed that don't need slabbing. And unlike other gimmicks used to encourage more submissions, this one DIRECTLY encourages ruining coins.
Edited by ziggy29
07/23/2007 1:03 pm
Pillar of the Community
Amazon99's Avatar
United States
2443 Posts
 Posted 07/23/2007  3:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Amazon99 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with ziggy, plus I think some of the PCGS registry people have too much time and money on there hands.
New Member
United States
12 Posts
 Posted 08/12/2007  9:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bigbill to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This is the first I have heard of the "lowball registry set" concept. Can someone elaborate on what this is and how it works? Not knowing anything except what I have just read here, it does sound like a ploy from the grading firms to get more submissions from coins that would otherwise not be graded.
New Member
lightning's Avatar
United States
9 Posts
 Posted 08/15/2007  7:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add lightning to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'd go for the 63
Pillar of the Community
Irishraider's Avatar
United States
1454 Posts
 Posted 08/15/2007  8:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Irishraider to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
registry, smegistry, bah, just another way to take the fun out of collecting coins, what a shame.

Pillar of the Community
Spider5689's Avatar
United States
2269 Posts
 Posted 08/15/2007  11:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spider5689 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Go for the MS.
Valued Member
Sagan's Avatar
United States
57 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2007  1:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sagan to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
This is the first I have heard of the "lowball registry set" concept. Can someone elaborate on what this is and how it works? Not knowing anything except what I have just read here, it does sound like a ploy from the grading firms to get more submissions from coins that would otherwise not be graded.

PCGS runs a "Set Registry" (online here: http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/ ). Here you can register your various sets, and get it scored based on completeness and quality of the coins in set. They have a category for low-ball sets where you get points for the lower the quality. I think your comment on it sounds about right to me.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1231 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2007  6:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add onejinx to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The MS coin and if its in a slab it wouldn't be for long
  Previous TopicReplies: 33 / Views: 3,544Next Topic
Page: of 3

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.37 seconds to rattle this change. Forums