| Author |
Replies: 50 / Views: 4,897 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3234 Posts |
Carl: I appreciate the chemical explanation. I cannot disagree with you on any point you made. You're absolutely correct. I'd much rather be left with an extremely minute amount of metal missing than a big ugly green splotch. I have to say though, at 10X I'm not seeing any problems with the surfaces of these coins. It's possible at 20X you might see where the metal was disturbed by the removal of that crud. For all practical purposes...at this point (and I have no intention of selling these any time in the near future)...the coins are "market acceptable". There's nothing a dealer would find under any normal power they would be carrying with them to indicate any issues. I'm not saying that anything is hidden or attempted to be hidden; the coin surfaces have definitely improved. I will be curious to see these coins within a year to ensure that nothing strange occurred as a result. I'm fairly confident that they will come out fine, but I'll report either way (if I remember...LOL). I'm not trying to pull a fast one on anyone. Whenever I sell anything, I give full disclosure about a coin and if there are any problems and always give a full refund without hesitation. I don't believe in trying to hurt anyone in a deal.
Edited by Prethen 07/10/2007 1:23 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
936 Posts |
I clean some of my wheat cents and see no damage under magnification. I use Witch Hazel to soak them and loosen up some of the crud covering parts of the varieties or errors. I do not see the problem with this, it is an circulated cent. Who knows what is has been through in the last 50-100 years. I could understand if it was an proof or high mint state grade. I think maybe some people have confused the "no cleaning" rule to apply to all coins and to all types of conservation. I have an 1909 that could have an "S" under some gunk, and could have an "VDB" under some more crud. The cleaned VDB's go for some good money on Heritage, so I think it is worth the time and energy to "conserve" MY coins. Just think if I screw one up, that is one less in the system and make some other peoples more valuable. Win-Win!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3234 Posts |
Thank you "chrsb". I think what you're highlighting is that perhaps the pendulum is being swung too far the other way. Yes, it's good to be paranoid about cleaning coins, but it's absurd to leave them as worthless chunks of metal if there are suitable techniques for improving them without short- or longterm harm.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2177 Posts |
It's clearer now what your point is Prethen. I wholeheartedly agree with your last statement. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
167 Posts |
Does anyone really know for sure how Numismatic Conservation Services (NCS) may remove the green crud from a copper coin? Or even if they do?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2443 Posts |
I know NCS does, but I'm not sure how. I think they do the things like everyone else would, acetone, etc.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3234 Posts |
I can't imagine too many other special "potions" that aren't already in general use such as acetone and alcohol.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
974 Posts |
 Well if they get too messed up, we could always heat them and make "error coins" out of them and put them on ebay for big bucks! Reference: https://goccf.com/t/16541 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
167 Posts |
Found this on NCS board under the verdigris. all below is straight off the post.
"What is called verdigris is often caused by several different things.
Some green encrustation on a copper coin is protecting the surface of the coin. Although this could be removed, it will leave the coin vunerable to further deterioration quickly. When the encrustation appears to be of this type, NCS conservators will most likely not remove the encrustion.
Other green on copper coins is corrosion which can and should be removed. The coin will be more stable in the long-term and more attractive as well. Usually the coin will still be deemed "corroded" by a major third party grading service such as NGC in this case.
Other green can be PVC residue. This can usually be removed safely. Assuming the PVC has not begun to eat into the surface of the coin and it does not have other irreversible surface problems, the coin should be gradeable by a third party grading service.
Chris, NCS"
To each there own, clean away if you must.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3234 Posts |
What NCS says absolutely makes sense. In fact, there is a minute amount of green left that looks like it's part of the coin around the "N" on the 1925 that I was unable to gently remove. I think this is what NCS is referring to as the green stuff that shouldn't be removed. The other stuff came off fairly easily and no "new" metal was showing underneath that should be reacting to the air. The coins, under power, shows no hint of being "stressed" or moved metal. Although, I will watch to see what happens over the course of a year. I think NCS knows what they're doing and what they're talking about. For instance, the "patina" or green areas on many ancient copper/bronze coins should remain as is and actually improves the overall eye appeal and originality of these coins. Removing that would be a total disaster for ancients.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
What NCS says is completely true. They, however, kept out the technical explanations knowing most would not understand. When a grading service checks out copper coins they attempt to evaluate if any green patina is from normal Oxydation as I discribed earlier. This is what they indicate as something that is normally not removed. If, however, the greenish substance turns out to be a Cupric Sulfating substance that could continue errosion through chemical compounding, it should be removed to stop continuation of errosion. Such coins should be protected from whatever created such contaminations though. As to PVC contaminations, it is not PVC that creats problems with coins. PVC itself is a stable Organic compound, melting point of 212F degrees but is rather stiff so chemicals are added to make them softer. This substance, Phthalates, tend to leak out over a period of time. Naturally after a while there is very little left to contaminate anything so if the PVC has become rather stiff, most of the Phthalates have leaked off indicating the PVC is not completely harmless. Please note in many areas your household water supplies are in PVC piping. Therefore the PVC scare of coin damage is usually exagerated. However, as noted it takes experts to determine what is to be removed and what is not on coins. But if the coins are not of any value, it really doesn't matter anyway. I too have cleaned many, many coins and must admit as long as they are not for sale, they do look nice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3234 Posts |
Carl: Is there any way you'd recommend to possibly neutralize a coins surface from continuing to corrode, especially if this corrosive green stuff was removed? After removal, is there a procedure you would do immediately to help prevent further corrosion?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
167 Posts |
Prethen,
I like the new title change you made, as some new collectors can see why cleaning a coin can be very subjective.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3234 Posts |
It definitely is controversial! To be perfectly honest, I'm a little concerned that there may be people who read this thread that think I personally am in the habit of cleaning and/or destroying coins. That's simply not true. I'm extremely careful and equally concerned about maintaining the coin's original look (patina and all!). I never touch a coins surface unless I think it's absolutely necessary. Yes, I've ruined my share of coins in the past.
|
|
New Member
United States
32 Posts |
prethan you did an exceptional job with this copper coin it turned out well and by doing this properly you not only removed the pvc and other gunk from the coin you left the surfaces intact not really cleaning per say and yes every coin is different and some might not turn out like this but........ this time you did well and saved a coin kind of like washing your car off of all the corrosive salt and you did not leave any hairlines or scratches on the paint job  in other words you left the original surfaces for the most part intact and this coin will still grade at the top tier services or in other words I would be proud to add this coin to my collection  with coins it is different with every scenerio some work out and some do not it is all a guesstimate and experience this time prethen it worked out and you did well  there are no sure things or absolutes in coins, coin buying, coin grading just experience and making the best choice out of a few options ........................
|
| |
Replies: 50 / Views: 4,897 |