Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Canon Fd 200 MM F 4 Macro. (1:1)

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 8,248Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4038 Posts
 Posted 04/01/2014  11:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rmpsrpms to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I did a search and I think the issue of misunderstanding is one of cause and effect, though in this case it is even more complicated from terminology perspective. "Falloff" is an effect of various phenomena, one of which is mechanical vignetting. "Vignetting" is one cause of falloff, but in the extreme it is an effect all by itself, and sometimes an intentional/artistic one. When I say "vignetting" I am referring to the effect of strong darkening around the periphery of a photo. When a lens reviewer says "falloff", he is referring to the minor reduction of light around the periphery of a photograph caused by physical phenomena. Terminology is tough when one of the terms is both cause and effect. You could even say "vignetting" is caused by vignetting! I'll stick with a simple definition of the effects and ignore causes. Otherwise you have to say all lenses vignette, which indeed they do, but it is useless to speak of them that way since it is a qualitative description. Instead, it is useful to say all lenses have falloff, which is quantitative, and thus has a full spectrum from 0%-100% to work with.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at:
http://macrocoins.com
Pillar of the Community
austrokiwi's Avatar
2087 Posts
 Posted 08/12/2014  07:21 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add austrokiwi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I haven't posted any more infor on this lens but seeing that someone else has picked up a canon FD macro lens this may be a timely post. I like the 200mm but it has one nasty fault: chromatic aberration(CA). For those like me he aren't that familiar with photography terms: CA usually occurs in photos on areas that have the greatest contrast. at those points...the different light colours separate ( like in a prism) as they pass through the lens) leading to either red blue or a combination of both fringing. Heres a test photo of an NZ 3d ( about 17mm in diameter) it looks ok until you do some pixel peeping ( second photo) then as you become aware of what you are looking for you see it in parts of the coins design( first photo) My standard technique of using back lighting really begs for CA.

Canon-Fd-200-MM-F-4-Macro.-1:1

Canon-Fd-200-MM-F-4-Macro.-1:1

My standard camera these days is a Sony A7r and the canon FD lens is mounted using a novoflex adapter. I recently installed into the camera an application that allows me to programme in a lens compensation profile....I don't have all the technical knowledge I would like but luckily the camera allowed me to adjust the lens profile while using a subject. My best effort so far led to the following photographs( the second is a crop)

Canon-Fd-200-MM-F-4-Macro.-1:1

Canon-Fd-200-MM-F-4-Macro.-1:1

The CA is still evident but is greatly reduced...and the overall picture is better. I know lightroom will allow you to make similar adjustments after taking a picture... but its nice to be able to do it as you take a shot. All that said at the price one pays for some canon FD macro lenses some of you may well think it better to stick to more modern lenses where modern coatings deal with CA far more effectively. I must admit from time to time I consider selling the FD 200 simply because of the CA. I haven't so far as it has proved brilliant for close ups of parts of coins.....Should Zeiss produce a macro for the Sony A7r then I think the canon fd 200mm will have to be sold!!
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4038 Posts
 Posted 08/12/2014  10:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rmpsrpms to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't see a whole lot of difference. Both sets look good, though there is obvious diffraction softening.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at:
http://macrocoins.com
Pillar of the Community
austrokiwi's Avatar
2087 Posts
 Posted 08/13/2014  12:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add austrokiwi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I don't see a whole lot of difference. Both sets look good, though there is obvious diffraction softening.


I was a little disappointed as the posted photos don't really show how bad the CA is( its bad) click on the first photo to go to my photo bucket and you will see how serious it is. later to day I will repeat the photos...I hadn't picked up on the diffraction
  Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 8,248Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums