Quote:
It is not natural to see a bright reflection from the field but a dark top of the head and hair.
I do agree, although axial lighting (or my method) is not exactly "natural" either: the light is striking the coin at roughly perpendicular, creating an outlining effect around design elements where light reflects away from the lens axis. Not making excuses here; just pointing out what I consider "natural" vs. studio lighting. The last shot
is natural in every way, including those technical details. due to light source/direction. Naturally, it still boils down to
technical +
technique +
artistic license to get the results you want. Personally, I'd get bored if I did hundreds of coin shots all using the same exact technique. Trial/error/experimentation keeps it interesting.

my studio lighting on the coin (pic 3) is hitting slightly below the coin's perpendicular axis. While I was testing how light can model the relief, I do agree that a more "naturalistic" treatment would improve the impact. The jaw line in particular is far too under-lit as is the hair. This should be shot again, but this time the light should come from slightly above and to the right in order to more naturally define the profile and hair. It may lose some definition on the lettering, but the overall look will improve.
Quote:
PS...would very much like to see details of your pseudo axial setup.
Will do--once I am satisfied with my results. I ought to shoot some moderns as well, since they're
much easier to achieve this effect. If I can achieve the desired effect on this ancient, I will update this thread. Thanks for commenting!

Edited by DVCollector
08/29/2014 2:09 pm