| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 3,000 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19948 Posts |
My Cannon SD700IS is pretty good, I'm sure many of you have seen my pics. However, I'm considering an upgrade (I paid $400) for this cam. Wondering which cam out there does the best job for macro photography? The only "problem" have with mine is not enough "magnification", I'd like to get really, really close for detailed pics. My Cannon just won't focus good enough when the lens is an inch or so from the object.....I'm sure there's a better cam for me, I just don't which one.
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2254 Posts |
Straight from a topic not too long ago made my Superdave. Need I say more? quote:
Go look at my Gallery, particularly the "Collection" and "Dansco 7070" albums. The pics you see are less than half-size of the originals. I would, immodestly, say that they're pretty good shots.
http://www.coincommunity.org/galler...hp?cat=10003
I use a Digital Rebel with a dedicated Canon 100mm Macro lens. You're probably looking at the Digital Rebel XTi, the newer model of mine. It's likely the "kit" model, including the 28-55 factory lens, and a tremendous all-around value if you're only going to own one camera. That lens will also do very good coin shots, if you set things up carefully because the 28-55 is not a good macro lens. You can expect results similar in size and quality to my Gallery; the Macro lens gives me only the additional size.
I recommend this camera with real enthusiasm. The results speak for themselves. However, if you are planning on dedicating it exclusively for macro photography, I would recommend getting the same model as mine plus the dedicated lens I use. My camera is currently available from reputable online dealers for under $500 without a lens, and the lens I use can be had for just north of $450. There are a couple of other lenses of equal quality and slightly lesser magnification for less money.
If you are in this price range for a good camera, there are a few quality possibilities. I honestly believe that Canon's solution is better than the rest, because of the excellent lenses available. However, Nikon and Sony also have good entries in this field.
I must be honest with you. This price range is a step up in quality, and also a step up in knowledge and effort required to maximize the potential of the camera. You will still get stuffpy results if you put stuffpy effort into doing it, and you will then be out $1000 and unsatisfied with your results. Spend the money if you wish, but be prepared to learn to use your excellent new toy. It would be my pleasure to help.
|
|
New Member
Finland
4 Posts |
I shoot coins with Canon 5d an Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro, for larger coins I use a 100mm f2.8. You really cant beat these. If you want magnificion, buy a slr and invert a 50mm lens to a macro.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
I've shot macro for years, and I've had good success in the past with the Nikon Coolpix series. Recently, I upgraded to a Nikon dSLR with their fantastic 60mm macro lens. I shot this hand-held on the fly:  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2443 Posts |
I just stick my cannon as close to the coin as possible. Both were taken by hand quickly.    |
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
193 Posts |
Nikon D80 with the 60mm Macro lens works best for me. :)
SuperDave:
What Macro lens are you using? Sounds like you are getting 1:1 (or Better)
Edited by 7070
11/26/2007 4:03 pm
|
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
quote:
What Macro lens are you using? Sounds like you are getting 1:1 (or Better)
I'm using a 350D with the 100mm f/2.8 Macro. Theoretically it requires a focal length of 12" from the subject; experience tells me it's better than that, and, yes, it'll do better than 1:1.  I consider myself to be living proof that good enough equipment can overcome the flaws of the photographer. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
668 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
363 Posts |
With the kind of resolution in Dave's photos, you almost gotta ask: Does anyone really need a microscope?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2797 Posts |
Zacharycash,
I just got a Canon S5 IS for my birthday. Is the lens you mentioned an add-on extra? I have tried to use the built in macro function, but the camera won't focus in AF or MF under 15 inches. I haven't tried the super-macro yet. Any suggestions?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1173 Posts |
Edited by hunter20ga
11/27/2007 11:03 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
668 Posts |
Yea the lens is an addon. I bought mine at Amazon.com and I think it is well worth it |
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 3,000 |
|
Posted 11/19/2007 1:30 pm
