| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,803 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
974 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
Both very full strikes for New Orleans, and they look to be minimally bagmarked, although hard to tell for sure on that second one's heavily toned obverse. Each MS64 at least, and MS65 certainly possible.
Colligo ergo sum
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
506 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
291 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
167 Posts |
I see the first one is NGC graded.
63 and 64 respectively. I have no problem withwith the color although I don't find them particularly nice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2187 Posts |
I'd say 63-64 for the graded one and 65 for the other
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
First one Au58, second MS65
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
974 Posts |
Thanks for the evaluations. I feel the top one was undergraded as well, atleast a MS63.   It seems to me that when individuals, not dealers, send coins in they are A LOT harder grading them. So based upon the consensus the bottom one would grade a MS62-63 since most feel it would be a MS65 if NGC was consistent. Not sure it's worth getting it graded then. 
Edited by Nelrak 11/21/2014 12:24 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
506 Posts |
Maybe they found the toning ugly? I do agree that it seems dealers get higher grades when they submit compared to us, although our coins are supposed to be "anonymous"
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
567 Posts |
Love the toning and strike detail on the reverse of number 2, I'm not a big fan of Morgans usually but that is one nice coin!
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,803 |
|