| Author |
Replies: 3,574 / Views: 97,470 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3772 Posts |
Both no - before their time.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1121 Posts |
It seems like you have gone to bed, so, I am off, too. Good night.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3772 Posts |
Nope, I never get to bed that early.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23731 Posts |
If it's Roman it probably a provincial, in that case I'm going to need a clue.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3772 Posts |
You want another clue before making a guess?
It's not Roman.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23731 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3772 Posts |
Nope - it's not from Africa (and don't forget that I said that it's tricky)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3772 Posts |
Sorry, got to sleep now - tomorrow will be well over 100 on your scale.
Final hint: it's no from Europe either.
If you want, remove the image and I'll post it next time with all clues given so far.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23731 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Italy
1790 Posts |
This is why I stick to Roman coinage . Is it from India ?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3772 Posts |
Not Indian - closer to the Roman Empire.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23731 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3772 Posts |
Pretty sure that you, like many other collectors of ancient coins would recognise the whole coin from miles away. As a very strong hint: no inscription on the obverse, just two busts.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Italy
1790 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3772 Posts |
Nope - let me also summarise two results from earlier hints: it belongs to the first two centuries AD.
Postscript:
As a Roman history fan, you should be able to work it out.
Edited by Medieval 01/02/2015 5:28 pm
|
| |
Replies: 3,574 / Views: 97,470 |