Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Coins In "Good" Condition

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,493Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
jpsned's Avatar
United States
2204 Posts
 Posted 12/13/2014  1:39 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add jpsned to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I remember when I first started collecting and was learning about grading a coin's condition. It was quite a surprise when I saw that a coin in "good" condition actually looked pretty bad!

Anyone have similar thoughts?
Pillar of the Community
Debrajc's Avatar
United States
4211 Posts
 Posted 12/13/2014  1:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Debrajc to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It depends on the coin. I have a few 'good' IH pennies that are actually very nice looking coins with exceptional brown coloring, just worn. But yeah....some "good" coins are just plain awful looking.
Rest in Peace
Buddy's Avatar
United States
7075 Posts
 Posted 12/13/2014  1:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Buddy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, I remember the first time I looked at the Red Book and there was "Good" looking not good at all. LOL I was completely unfamiliar with the terms AU, BU, PL, etc.

The thing is that I had read some coin magazines when I was a kid but grading coins didn't mean much until I got serious about collecting.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
mysilveryears's Avatar
United States
1888 Posts
 Posted 12/13/2014  5:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mysilveryears to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
'Good' is such a relative term. You can't break it down into measurable units like millimeters or the width of fuzzy cat hairs.
One person's 'good' might be another collector's 'gawdawful'.
I felt the same way as ye three when childhood coin collecting fascination first began to require guide books and something other than cigar boxes for storage.
It seems to me that 'good' is just some sort of general base line grade to differentiate the collectible from the cull.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts
 Posted 12/13/2014  7:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add just carl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
When I was a kid and purchased a thing called the Red Book and looked up some coins. I found that the worst grade used was G for Good. Then I looked at what they and others said was GOOD. Good to most ment a bit better than lousy, horrible or miserable. Never could figure out who or why this was started. To me GOOD means GOOD, not lousy.
Pillar of the Community
scottk's Avatar
United States
767 Posts
 Posted 12/13/2014  7:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add scottk to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yeah, it's kind of odd that only one grade on the entire scale "poor" actually says something negative about the coin.

"Extremely Fine", "Fair", "About Good" - all those sound like the coin should be attractive.
Edited by scottk
12/13/2014 7:40 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
Sap's Avatar
Australia
16827 Posts
 Posted 12/14/2014  03:41 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The numismatic definition of "good" as "well, it's pretty bad, actually" does trip up many newcomers to the hobby.

The reason why we use "good" this way is historic. Way back when coin collecting was beginning, during the Renaissance, "Good" actually did mean "pretty good". The original grade levels were Poor, Fair, Good and Fine. And for ancient Greek and Roman coins (which was all anyone collected back then) found by accident in the age before metal detectors, these were all the grading levels they needed. As coin collecting progressed and as coin production technology improved, grades ever higher than "Fine" had to be invented, as well as interstitial grades in between the original four.

Gradeflation has happened since, as well. Today's "Very Fine" coin would have been called "Good" 300 years ago.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
Pillar of the Community
1325 Posts
 Posted 12/14/2014  08:21 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add shadz to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I consider it a "good" coin if I can read the date and any mintmark. anything else is "worn" I have only 1 coin that I cannot read the date, but haven't tried with microscope yet so the only "worn" coin I have got form circulation is a buff.
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,493Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums