| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 1,146 |
|
|
Valued Member
Italy
220 Posts |
thank's very much  |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Looks like an 1824, but I'll wager an AU-55.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
The reverse seems to be a light strike, because there are flats on some the high points of the design: eagle's eyebrow, and the leading edges of the wings, but very little wear on lower high points of the design.
Minimal but findable wear on the high areas on the obverse. Some, but not all of the stars are a little flat.
Attractive coin.
AU55.
|
|
Valued Member
109 Posts |
I think AU as well, even though the photos don't show the luster very well. I like the color.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36839 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1095 Posts |
I'll say AU-58, beautiful coin, love the color and the stars are very strong.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
688 Posts |
AU-55 as well, possibly as high as AU-58.
Either way, it is a gorgeous coin with great eye appeal!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
172 Posts |
NICE coin in some respects. I was not aware of the strike issue (right wing "finger area" wear) so without that information I would have given it an AU-58+. If the strike IS light as claimed an MS-60. Still, if I were writing a description of it I would be certain to mention the uneven face toning. Ug.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
AU 50 It's lacking a bit of luster.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
AU55 from here, toning may hide some of the luster
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3843 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
Definitely AU I'd guess Au55 max, photos don't show justice of the coin in regards to mint luster.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,146 |
|
Posted 03/10/2015 08:09 am
