Quote:
Would you consider these actual coins?
To use the Australian slang expression, they are "Claytons coins" - in other words, they're the coins that you're issuing when you're not issuing coins. (for those curious as to the derivation of the slang expression, see
Wikipedia)
Since they are issued by an authorized government agency for the purpose of being used as money, personally I would have to answer "yes, they are coins, rather than tokens". Though I suspect that ultimately the long-term answer to the question depends on how they are accepted by the Zimbabwean public. French Chamber of Commerce "good for" tokens issued after WWI are today accepted as "French coins", because the French people of the day happily accepted them as such.
By all accounts, the Zimbabwean people are currently highly suspicious of these "coins".
Here's last month's thread on the topic, with a link to a South African news source.
Given Zimbabwe's history of strictly enforcing their own anti-coin-export laws and the amount of trouble that they've gone to to make and issue these "coins", I suspect that very, very few of them will ever make it into the hands of foreign collectors. Unless the experiment proves a dismal failure and the Zimbabwe government dumps them all onto the world market in an effort to recoup their lost cash.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis