| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,767 |
|
Valued Member
United States
290 Posts |
1962 almost looks new with sharp edges it actually cut me but any ways it looks to me its a poor strike I can barely see the middle. thank you! p.s. I am working my butt off finding these but It is fun!  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Yeh, the portico features are weak. Your lighting wiped out the steps so I can't see anything there. If you need it and it cost only 5¢ then it's okay until you can find one better.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
290 Posts |
roger that thank you ill see if I can get a better picture sorry
|
|
Valued Member
United States
331 Posts |
is this an error. I am just starting out in errors.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
290 Posts |
thank you for the postings  that's another alright I think I'm getting the hang of this I have others but its a pain trying to get the pictures clear and its a pain in the bottom (----  to size them, but posting is very easy.
Edited by teachmind111 04/19/2015 08:49 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
90% sure, weather it be Grease Filled Die or poor strike. Can't really tell for sure w/o better pics.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
This is a perfect example of what I meant when I told you to learn what the coin should look like, before worrying about errors.
This is an excellent strike for a 1962 Jefferson. The hair detail is full, the portico roof and dome are sharply defined, and I can clearly see the steps. Heck, it could be Full Steps, and 1962 is relatively uncommon with Full Steps. Jeffersons with Full Steps can be tough because the steps are directly opposite the area around the ear, which is a higher and fuller point of the obverse, requiring a lot of metal to fill. The other side of the coin suffers as a result. An MS66 Jefferson sold at Heritage earlier this month for $34. An MS66 Full Steps Jefferson sold the month before for $325. They're that rare.
Your very first assumption - that it's a weak strike - is completely wrong and that has caused you to see things which aren't there.
Learn the coin first, then worry about errors.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
290 Posts |
I have something to show you but give me a few minutes thank you for all your posts they been very nice
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Teachmind, I ask your forgiveness if anything I've said comes across as testy. I want very badly to teach you, and you're not learning at the rate I want you to.
That's not your problem, it's mine. There is no doubt of your interest or motivation, and if I'm failing it's only because I haven't figured out how you learn. That's frustrating, but I'm frustrated with myself and not you.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
This maybe a proof coin that was released into circulation. It may have been over polished on the reverse die. The other devices look thinner as well if part of the surface where polished away. I've seen them isolated in certain areas.    (center image)
Edited by coop 04/19/2015 1:23 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
290 Posts |
thank you coop you have been very helpful actually a lot of good advice do you have a web sit. all of yall been helpful even you superdave I did learn some things from all that. its just feels like I am over doing it sometimes if fun though I cant stop 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I visit this site the most often. I do frequent a few others. But nothing special other than the video in my signature. That has helped a lot of new ones.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3644 Posts |
Wow Dave,I knew they were rare but WOW on the price difference! I like checking them auctions once in a whole too-I should look more often you learn quite a bit ...
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
I agree with coop, it is an impaired proof.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
Thick rim, full step detail, no signs of mint luster; just proof luster.
Impaired proof. Saw it immediately when I first clicked on this thread when it was posted.
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,767 |