| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,664 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
738 Posts |
please help grading  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
I hate to be first. The cheek looks amazing, but pics are a bit tough to see. If the luster is there, and it's as good as it appears to be, MS65+
Can't wait to see what others say.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
I say that photo can be hiding enough that I'm not comfortable putting a number on it from them:(
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
738 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
I'll lower to a solid MS64
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
738 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
Better pics. I'll go with 63+
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36830 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
These would be much larger and better images if you could crop out all the wasted extra space, especially since they're clear enough to take a stab at grading even small as they are. I see a really flat obverse strike, in fact I'm surprised with that much of the hair and ear gone we don't see flattening elsewhere.
I'm OK with it at about 63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
738 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
738 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
It could go either way depending on the mood of the grader at the time he gets your coin. Strong 63 probably 63+ but 64 isn't out of the question.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: so,guys 63 or 64?
Within the bounds of the available information, yes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,664 |
|