| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,670 |
|
|
Valued Member
Norway
61 Posts |
Edited by christians86 07/03/2015 7:19 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
I would leave them as is. They will carry better resale value in PCGS holders.
JMHO -Ron
|
|
Valued Member
 Norway
61 Posts |
Probably not in Norway, there they will be judged by the grade, not PCGS/NGC or green holder.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
59 Posts |
I think that you are lucky to have those good grades; I wouldn't resubmit any of them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2373 Posts |
Regrading those will be a mistake. None in my opinion will grade higher. nlp
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
I agree with NLP. I don't see a one of those that I would consider resubmitting. In fact, I'd say a couple of them were rather loosely graded - but that might just be because of the reflection of the slab or marks on the slab which are difficult to differentiate from the coins themselves.
In any event, if they were mine, I wouldn't resubmit any of them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
Enjoy them as they are. Those are some STUNNING coins you have. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Absolutely do not apend the money - you would be lucky to do as well. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Just a suggestion, but 'do not touch those coins.' They are terrific as is.
Edited by edweather 07/03/2015 7:43 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
Definitely leave them in the current holders.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
589 Posts |
Quote: Enjoy them as they are. Those are some STUNNING coins you have. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36828 Posts |
The only one I see that "might" get an upgrade would be the 1882 - MS64, very clean cheek that "might" pull MS-65. Everything else looks about right.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Norway
61 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,670 |
|