| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,471 |
|
New Member
United States
35 Posts |
What do you guys think?   Adam
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
Yes. Too blurry. FG looks correct for the date though.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
241 Posts |
Pics are a little too fuzzy to tell. It looks like the designer initials might be close to the memorial building, however, which would suggest a Wide AM, but hard to say for sure. Can you take another photo?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
You seem to have what we refer to in the Photography World, as a severe case of "Hand Shake".
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Can't tell for certain with those pics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1414 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
35 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
35 Posts |
I see that the TAT and signature don't match a Close AM now... Guess it is not close. The A and M being closer together is what threw me off.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Yes, it is close, but it is wide. When the designer's initials are close to the Memorial, it's wide, and vice versa.
Edited by CoinMasters 07/27/2015 11:03 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Wide AM was the normal one for that year. The 1993 started the Close AM design.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
486 Posts |
that is a Wide AM. one way you can tell is the TAT in states. the a is centered between them for a Wide AM, and it is a little off center for a Close AM
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
Not to mention the relief of the lincoln memorial. That's the dead giveaway.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1781 Posts |
Here is a look at the discovery coin. 
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,471 |