| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,009 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
124 Posts |
Opinions on this one? I think it looks decent for getting it as junk silver but I still have trouble figuring out a grade.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
Pics are kind of blurry. Looks like a AU-58 piece to me. What's the flaking going on near the band?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
124 Posts |
The flaking appearance seems to be a gouge of some kind. I will work on better pictures, but my camera is not cooperating and I may not have the best lighting.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Nice merc. to find in junk silver. I'm at VF-35. Too bad about the gouges on reverse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
946 Posts |
Au55-58 a lot of sharp detail left. The top and bottom band are fully split still
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
124 Posts |
I was sorting by date and noticed this earlier piece stand out from the rest in sharpness. At first I thought a spec of something was sitting on the band, too bad it is a part of it eaten out :/
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36830 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
EF45, just looks like too much wear for AU.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree with AU-55. Very nice coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
The gouges on the reverse would make this a details coin.
AU details
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
260 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
124 Posts |
Thanks for the insight guys!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
AU55. Not sure if the faucet is bad enough to warrent details
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,009 |
|